Introduction

Oral administration of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid) was found to be promising in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019. The active antiviral component nirmatrelvir in Paxlovid is co-formulated with ritonavir, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor. Many oral targeted therapies indicated for lung cancer are known substrates of CYP 3A4, and concurrent use with Paxlovid may lead to potential drug-drug interaction (DDI). The purpose of this review is to evaluate the potential DDI between targeted therapies and supportive care for lung cancer and ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir.

Methods

Drug database search in PubMed and the Food and Drug Administration was conducted to identify pharmacokinetic data on oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used in NSCLC, both Food and Drug Administration approved and those in development. Metabolism pathways for various TKIs are extracted, and the impact of TKI area under the curves and maximum concentration by strong CYP 3A4 inducers and inhibitors is summarized. The most common toxicities and supportive care medications for the TKI were identified.

Results

Among EGFR and exon 20 insertion inhibitors, afatinib is least likely to be affected by CYP 3A4, followed by dacomitinib and osimertinib. Among ALK inhibitors, alectinib is the least susceptible to CYP 3A4. ROS1 inhibitors are affected by CYP 3A4 inhibition with the exception of crizotinib. Among MET inhibitors, capmatinib is substantially affected by CYP 3A4 inhibition. Drug exposure of RET inhibitors is expected to increase with CYP 3A4 inhibition, with selpercatinib being the least affected. Certain supportive care medications for lung cancer TKI may have relevant DDIs.

Conclusions

The clinical impact of the DDI between lung cancer TKI and ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir varies largely on the basis of the susceptibility of CYP 3A4 inhibition caused by the antiviral. Close monitoring and medication adjustments (i.e., dose changes or alternative coronavirus disease 2019 therapy) can be used to overcome DDI to ensure patient safety.

Background

The T2 descriptor for staging non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) contains several non-size-based criteria. It remains unknown whether the prognostic significance of these non-size-based criteria is dependent on tumor size.

Methods

A total of 10,545 patients with stage IB NSCLC from the California Cancer Registry between 1989 to 2003 were categorized into the following three nonoverlapping criteria: (1) tumor size (T2S); (2) visceral pleura invasion, hilar atelectasis, or obstructive pneumonitis (T2P); and (3) main bronchus involvement > or = 2 cm from the carina (T2C). Univariate survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate survival analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards ratios.

Results

A total of 51.1% of patients with stage IB NSCLC were staged by T2S, 43.2% by T2P, and 5.7% by T2C; 2,224 stage IB patients (total, 21.1%; 18.9% T2P + 2.2% T2C) had tumors < or = 3 cm in size. The 5-year survival rate and the median survival time of these stage IB patients with tumors < or = 3 cm in size were as follows: T2P, 51.2% and 64 months, respectively; T2C, 49.0% and 58 months, respectively. These values were similar to the 53.2% 5-year survival rate and 67-month median survival time for patients with stage IA NSCLC (p = 0.40). Cox proportional hazards model revealed T2P of > 3 cm was a poor prognostic factor for survival (vs T2S; hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.24). Conversely, T2P < or = 3 cm was a favorable prognostic factor for survival (vs T2S; HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.96). T2C was not an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Conclusions

Prognostic significance of the non-size-based T2 descriptor T2P is dependent on tumor size.

Our current treatment paradigm of advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) classifies the six currently approved ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into three generations. The 2nd-generation (2G) and 3rd-generation (3G) ALK TKIs are all "single mutant active" with varying potencies across a wide spectrum of acquired single ALK resistance mutations. There is a vigorous debate among clinicians which is the best upfront ALK TKI is for the first-line (1L) treatment of ALK+ NSCLC and the subsequent sequencing strategies whether it should be based on the presence of specific on-target ALK resistance mutations or not. Regardless, sequential use of "single mutant active" ALK TKIs will eventually lead to double ALK resistance mutations in cis. This has led to the creation of fourth generation (4G) "double mutant active" ALK TKIs such as TPX-0131 and NVL-655. We discuss the critical properties 4G ALK TKIs must possess to be clinically successful. We proposed conceptual first-line, second-line, and molecularly-based third-line registrational randomized clinical trials designed for these 4G ALK TKIs. How these 4G ALK TKIs would be used in the future will depend on which line of treatment the clinical trial design(s) is adopted provided the trial is positive. If approved, 4G ALK TKIs may usher in a new treatment paradigm for advanced ALK+ NSCLC that is based on classifying ALK TKIs based on the intrinsic functional capabilities ("singe mutant active" versus "double mutant active") rather than the loosely-defined "generational" (first-, second-,third-,fourth-) classification and avoid the current clinical approaches of seemingly random sequential use of 2G and 3G ALK TKIs.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis carries a significant morbidity and mortality in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are highly CNS-penetrant and have demonstrated remarkable intracranial activity across clinical studies, and yet radiation remains the mainstay of treatment modality against CNS metastasis. We have previously reported alectinib can induce CNS radiation necrosis even after a remote history of radiation (7 years post-radiation). Lorlatinib is another potent next-generation ALK TKI that can overcome many ALK resistance mutations and has been shown to have excellent activity in patients with baseline CNS metastasis. Here we report two ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients who developed radiation necrosis shortly after initiating lorlatinib following progression on the sequential treatment of crizotinib, alectinib, and brigatinib. In both cases, radiation necrosis is evidenced by serial MRI images and histological examination of the resected CNS metastasis that had previously been radiated. Our cases highlight the importance of recognizing CNS radiation necrosis that may mimic disease progression in ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with and potentially precipated by next-generation ALK TKIs.

Background

ASP3026 is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that has potent in vitro activity against crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive tumors. This open-label, multicenter, first-in-human phase I study ( NCT01284192 ) assessed the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of ASP3026.

Methods

Advanced solid tumor patients received oral ASP3026 in 3 + 3 dose-escalation cohorts at doses of 25-800 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. The endpoints were to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and the pharmacokinetic profile of ASP3026. A phase Ib expansion cohort enrolled patients with metastatic, crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive solid tumors at the RP2D, and response was evaluated by RECIST 1.1.

Results

The dose-escalation cohort enrolled 33 patients, including three crizotinib-resistant, ALK-positive patients, and the dose-expansion cohort enrolled another 13 crizotinib-resistant, ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. ASP3026 demonstrated both linear pharmacokinetics and dose-proportional exposure for area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum concentration observed with a median terminal half-life of 35 h, supporting the daily dosing. Grade 3 rash and elevated transaminase concentrations were dose-limiting toxicities observed at 800 mg; hence, 525 mg daily was the MTD and RP2D. The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea (38%), fatigue (35%), and vomiting (35 %). Among the 16 patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive tumors (15 NSCLC, 1 neuroblastoma), eight patients achieved partial response (overall response rate 50%; 95% confidence interval 25-75%) and seven patients (44%) achieved stable disease.

Conclusions

ASP3026 was well tolerated and had therapeutic activity in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive advanced tumors.

Trial registration

ClinTrials.gov: NCT01284192.

Introduction

A novel CD74-NRG2α fusion has recently been identified in NSCLC. We surveyed a large tumor database comprehensively profiled by whole transcriptome sequencing to investigate the incidence and distribution of NRG2 fusions among various solid tumors.

Methods

Tumor samples submitted for clinical molecular profiling at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) that underwent whole transcriptome sequencing (NovaSeq [Illumina, San Diego, CA]) were retrospectively analyzed for NRG2 fusion events. All NRG2 fusions with sufficient reads (> three junctional reads spanning ≥ seven nucleotides) were identified for manual review, characterization of fusion class, intact functional domains, EGF-like domain isoforms, breakpoints, frame retention, and co-occurring alterations by next-generation sequencing (NextSeq [Illumina, San Diego, CA], 592 genes).

Results

Seven inframe functional (containing the intact EGF-like domain) NRG2α fusions were identified, namely, the following: (1) NSCLC (two of 9600, 0.02%: CDH1-NRG2α [C11, N2], F11R-NRG2α [F1, N4]); (2) endometrial (two of 3060, 0.065%: CPM-NRG2α [C2, N2], OPA3-NRG2α [O1, N2]); (3) ovarian (one of 5030, 0.02%: SPON1-NRG2α [S6, N2]); (4) prostate (one of 1600, 0.063%: PLPP1-NRG2α [P1, N2]); and (5) carcinoma of unknown origin (one of 1400, 0.07%: CYSTM1-NRG2α [C2, N2]). No NRG2β fusions were identified. Both NSCLC samples contained the reciprocal NRG2 fusions (NRG2-CDH1, NRG2-F11R). Almost all inframe NRG2α fusions have no (N = 6, 85.7%) or low (N = 1, 14.3%) programmed death-ligand 1 expression. No additional known driver mutations were identified in these seven NRG2α fusion-positive tumor samples.

Conclusions

Similar to NRG1 fusions, NRG2α fusions are recurrent and rare ligand-fusions in NSCLC and other multiple tumor types, especially gynecologic malignancies.

Introduction

This phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose, and efficacy of crizotinib plus erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 after failure of one or two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Erlotinib, 100 mg, was given continuously once daily starting between day -14 and -7; crizotinib, 200 mg twice daily (dose level 1) or 150 mg twice daily (dose level -1), was added continuously beginning on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. Potential pharmacokinetic interactions between crizotinib and erlotinib were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-seven patients received treatment; 26 received crizotinib plus erlotinib. Frequent adverse events were diarrhea, rash, decreased appetite, and fatigue. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, dry eye, dysphagia, dyspepsia, esophagitis and vomiting. The MTD was crizotinib, 150 mg twice daily, with erlotinib, 100 mg once daily. Crizotinib increased the erlotinib area under the concentration-time curve 1.5-fold (dose level -1) and 1.8-fold (dose level 1). The plasma level of crizotinib appeared to be unaffected by coadministration of erlotinib. Two patients whose tumors harbored activating EGFR mutations achieved confirmed partial responses, one at each crizotinib dose level.

Conclusions

The MTD of the combination of crizotinib and erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC was crizotinib, 150 mg twice daily, with erlotinib, 100 mg once daily, which is less than the approved dose of either agent. The phase II portion of the study was not initiated.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) account for ≤ 12% of all EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancers. We analysed real-world datasets to determine the frequency of ex20ins variants, and the ability of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify them. Three real-world United States NGS databases were used: GENIE, FoundationInsights, and GuardantINFORM. Mutation profiles consistent with in-frame EGFR ex20ins were summarized. GENIE, FoundationInsights, and GuardantINFORM datasets identified 180, 627, and 627 patients with EGFR ex20ins respectively. The most frequent insertion region of exon 20 was the near loop (~ 70%), followed by the far loop (~ 30%) and the helical (~ 3-6%) regions. GENIE, FoundationInsights, and GuardantINFORM datasets identified 41, 102, and 96 unique variants respectively. An analysis of variants projected that ~ 50% of EGFR ex20ins identified by NGS would have been missed by PCR-based assays. Given the breadth of EGFR ex20ins identified in the real-world US datasets, the ability of PCR to identify these mutations is limited. NGS platforms are more appropriate to identify patients likely to benefit from EGFR ex20ins-targeted therapies.