Clinical management of many chronic ophthalmological disorders requires direct delivery of drugs into the vitreous. There is an important need to investigate novel needle-less alternatives to deliver drugs to the vitreous. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of a needle-less system using ultrasound to enhance vitreal delivery of small molecules through the sclera in an ex vivo model and to evaluate whether changes in permeability are mainly due to the heat generated by sonication. An eye cup containing 1 mL of sodium fluorescein 0.1% was placed on top of the sclera of cadaveric rabbit eyes. Treated eyes were sonicated for 10 minutes, and left in contact with the fluorescein solution for an additional 50 minutes. Control eyes received the same exposure to fluorescein solution (60 minutes) in the eye cup without ultrasound treatment. Vitreous humor was collected and analyzed using a fluorescence spectrophotometer to calculate the concentration of fluorescein that diffused into the vitreous humor. An additional set of eyes was treated using a heating probe to evaluate whether changes in permeability were mainly due to heat. Vitreous samples from ultrasound-treated eyes showed a 44.6% higher concentration of fluorescein compared to control eyes. The concentration of fluorescein in the vitreous of heat-treated eyes did not show a significant difference when compared to control eyes. Thus, phonophoresis is a promising needle-less method for vitreal drug delivery, and local heating conducted to the surface of the sclera should be mitigated because it does not enhance the efficacy of the method.

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between proangiogenic and inflammatory cytokines in concurrent vitreous, aqueous, and plasma samples from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Methods

Vitreous, aqueous, and plasma samples were analyzed using multiplex immunoassay for 10 PDR-related cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1], macrophage inflammatory protein-1β [MIP-1β], VEGF receptor 1 [Flt-1], placental growth factor [PlGF], VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D). A total of 17 patients with PDR and 7 controls were included. The primary outcome was correlation of cytokines in vitreous, aqueous, and plasma. The secondary outcome was the comparison of cytokine levels in controls and diabetics with and without recent anti-VEGF injection.

Results

The following factors were elevated in diabetics compared with controls: vitreous IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, MCP-1, MIP-1β, PlGF, and VEGF-A; and aqueous IL-6, IL-8, PlGF, and VEGF-C (all P < 0.05). Vitreous and aqueous IL-8, PlGF, and VEGF-A were significantly correlated in patients with PDR (all P < 0.05). Plasma cytokines were not correlated with those in vitreous and aqueous (all P > 0.05). Vitreous and aqueous IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, PlGF, and VEGF-A differed among controls and diabetics with and without recent anti-VEGF injection (all P < 0.05). In one-to-one comparisons, aqueous VEGF-A levels were lower in diabetic patients who had recent anti-VEGF injection compared with those who did not (P = 0.01).

Conclusions

In this proof-of-concept study, IL-8, VEGF-A, and PlGF demonstrated a strong correlation in vitreous and aqueous of patients with PDR. The aqueous may serve as a proxy for vitreous for some cytokines involved in PDR. Recent anti-VEGF injections decreased VEGF-A levels in aqueous, but did not significantly affect other cytokines, suggesting a role for other targeted therapies in PDR management.

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of using the Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) platform to detect biomarkers in vitreous and to compare the findings with results obtained with an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) sandwich immunoassay.

Methods

Vitreous samples from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and non-diabetic controls were tested using two different proteomics platforms. Forty-one assays were completed with the ECL platform and 459 with the PEA platform. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r_s ) was used to determine the direction and strength of the relationship between protein levels detected by both platforms.

Results

Three hundred sixty-six PEA assays detected the tested protein in at least 25% of samples, and the difference in protein abundance between PDR and controls was statistically significant for 262 assays. Seventeen ECL assays yielded a detection rate ≥ 25%, and the difference in protein concentration between PDR and controls was statistically significant for 13 proteins. There was a subset of proteins that were detected by both platforms, and for those the Spearman's correlation coefficient was higher than 0.8.

Conclusions

PEA is suitable for the analysis of vitreous samples, showing a strong correlation with the ECL platform. The detection rate of PEA panels was higher than the panels tested with ECL. The levels of several proinflammatory and angiogenic cytokines were significantly higher in PDR vitreous compared to controls.

Translational relevance

This study provides new information on the yields of small-volume assays that can detect proteins of interest in ocular specimens, and it identifies patterns of cytokine dysregulation in PDR.