Background and purpose

We compared [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose (FDG) versus 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine (FLT) for the purpose of identifying active pelvic bone marrow (BM), quantifying its locational variation, and determining which technique is likely to be better for BM-sparing radiation planning.

Material and methods

We sampled 41 patients, of which 25 underwent FDG-PET/CT only, 7 underwent FLT-PET/CT only, and 9 underwent both. Active BM subvolumes were defined as subsets of the pelvic BM with the highest standardized uptake values comprising 40%, 50%, and 60% of the total pelvic BM volume. We used the Dice similarity coefficient to quantify the percent overlap of active BM volumes of equal size. Differences in the spatial distribution of active BM were assessed using a region-growing algorithm.

Results

For patients with both modalities, the mean Dice coefficients for the 40%, 50%, and 60% subvolumes were 0.683, 0.732, and 0.781 respectively. Comparing individual active BM subvolumes to the mean subvolume, Dice coefficients varied from 0.598-0.889 for FDG and 0.739-0.912 for FLT. Region growing analysis showed FLT-PET defined more highly clustered active BM subvolumes.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of a small sample size, we found significant agreement between FDG-PET and FLT-PET; however, FLT-PET had significantly less individual variation and is likely to be superior to FDG-PET for BM-sparing radiotherapy.

Purpose

To quantify changes in bone marrow fat fraction and determine associations with peripheral blood cell counts.

Methods and materials

In this prospective study, 19 patients received either highly myelotoxic treatment (radiation therapy plus cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil mitomycin C [FU/MMC], or cisplatin/5-FU/cetuximab) or less myelotoxic treatment (capecitabine-radiation therapy or no concurrent chemotherapy). Patients underwent MR imaging and venipuncture at baseline, midtreatment, and posttreatment visits. We performed mixed effects modeling of the mean proton density fat fraction (PDFF[%]) by linear time, treatment, and vertebral column region (lumbar [L]4-sacral [S]2 vs thoracic [T]10-L3 vs cervical[C]3-T9), while controlling for cumulative mean dose and other confounders. Spearman rank correlations were performed by white blood cell (WBC) counts versus the differences in PDFF(%) before and after treatment.

Results

Cumulative mean dose was associated with a 0.43% per Gy (P=.004) increase in PDFF(%). In the highly myelotoxic group, we observed significant changes in PDFF(%) per visit within L4-S2 (10.1%, P<.001) and within T10-L3 (3.93%, P=.01), relative to the reference C3-T9. In the less myelotoxic group, we did not observe significant changes in PDFF(%) per visit according to region. Within L4-S2, we observed a significant difference between treatment groups in the change in PDFF(%) per visit (5.36%, P=.04). Rank correlations of the inverse log differences in WBC versus the differences in PDFF(%) overall and within T10-S2 ranged from 0.69 to 0.78 (P<.05). Rank correlations of the inverse log differences in absolute neutrophil counts versus the differences in PDFF(%) overall and within L4-S2 ranged from 0.79 to 0.81 (P<.05).

Conclusions

Magnetic resonance imaging fat quantification is sensitive to marrow composition changes that result from chemoradiation therapy. These changes are associated with peripheral blood cell counts. This study supports a rationale for bone marrow-sparing treatment planning to reduce the risk of hematologic toxicity.