Objective

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important complication of cryptococcal meningitis (CM) and impacts morbidity and mortality. Factors associated with permanent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement are poorly characterized.

Method

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with CM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from 1996 through 2015. Characteristics of patients at time of CM diagnosis who did and did not receive a VP shunt were compared with use of the 2-group chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the 2-group t test for continuous variables. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of shunt placement.

Results

Of 422 patients with cryptococcosis, 257 (60.9%) had CM. Mean age was 47.7 years, 71.6% were male, and 44.4% were African American. The most common underlying conditions were HIV (42.4%), solid organ transplantation (29.6%), and corticosteroid use (34.2%). Forty-four (17.1%) received a VP shunt a median of 17 days (range, 1-320 days) post-diagnosis. By multivariable analysis, baseline opening pressure >30 cm H₂O (OR, 9.4; 95% CI, 3.0, 28.8; P < .0001), being a normal host (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.5, 26.1; P = .011) and hydrocephalus (OR, 4.9, 95% CI, 1.3, 17.9); P = .017) were associated with increased odds of shunting (Table 2). In contrast, age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92, 0.99; P = .037) and male gender (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06, 0.55; P = .023) were associated with decreased odds of shunting.

Conclusions

Identification of factors at time of CM diagnosis associated with need for permanent VP shunt placement may allow for earlier, more aggressive treatment and potentially improve outcomes associated with increased ICP from cryptococcal meningitis.

Background

Asymmetry of hippocampal internal architecture (HIA) has been reported to be a frequent imaging finding in epilepsy patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who exhibit other signs of hippocampal sclerosis. HIA asymmetry may also be an independent predictor of the side of seizure onset in patients with otherwise normal MRI scans. The study of HIA asymmetry and its relationship to the laterality of TLE would benefit from a reliable method of assessing the clarity of HIA in MRI scans. We propose a visual scoring system that rates HIA clarity from 1 (imperceptible) to 4 (excellent) and report the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of this system.

Methods

In the initial preliminary phase of this study we examined IRR using a kappa statistic (κ) among a mixed group of expert and non-expert reviewers using only a brief description of the scoring system to score single images from a series of patients. In the second phase we explored the effect of training on the use of our HIA scoring system by assessing IRR among neuroimaging experts before and after a brief interactive training session. In this phase, multiple slices from each patient were scored. Separate κ values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated from the scores given to each hippocampal image and from the asymmetry of scores between left and right for each slice. In the third phase the effect of training on non-expert reviewers was explored using a similar approach as with the expert reviewers.

Results

In the preliminary phase of the study, HIA scoring of single images showed substantial agreement among expert reviewers (κHIA=0.65), fair agreement among non-expert reviewers (κHIA=0.27), and a fair to moderate degree of agreement among all the reviewers as a whole (κHIA=0.40). In the second phase, prior to training there was substantial agreement among expert reviewers in regard to the individual HIA scores (κHIA=0.62; ICCHIA=0.81) but only moderate agreement on the degree of asymmetry (κAsym=0.47; ICCAsym=0.71). Training improved agreement on the individual HIA scores (κHIA=0.58-0.72; ICCHIA=0.76-0.84) and on the degree of asymmetry (κAsym=0.61-0.67; ICCAsym=0.81-0.85). Among non-expert reviewers, scores improved from only a fair degree of agreement pre-training (κHIA=0.25, κAsym=0.25; ICCHIA=0.68, ICCAsym=0.66) to a moderate level of agreement after training (κHIA=0.54, κAsym=0.52; ICCHIA=0.78, ICCAsym=0.81).

Conclusions

The proposed HIA scoring system has a substantial degree of inter-rater reliability among experienced neuroimaging reviewers. Training improves the detection of asymmetries in HIA score in particular. Non-expert reviewers can employ the system with a moderate degree of reliability, and training has an even greater impact on the improvement of scoring reliability.