Pituitary adenomas (PAs) have been shown to cause excess cardiovascular disease comorbidity and mortality. Cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) is a small subset of cardiovascular disease with high morbidity, and its risk in patients with pituitary adenomas has been sparingly explored. In this review, we examine what is known about the prevalence of cerebrovascular disease in patients with PAs, from its initial discovery in 1970 to present. An abundance of literature describes increased cerebrovascular mortality in patients with acromegaly, while research on other PA subtypes is less frequent but shows a similarly elevated CeVD mortality relative to healthy populations. We also review how cerebrovascular risk changes after PAs are treated, with PA treatment appearing to prevent further accumulation of cerebrovascular risk without reversing prior elevations. While acromegaly-associated CeVD appears to be caused by elevated growth hormone (GH) levels and Cushing disease's elevated glucocorticoids similarly cause durable alterations in cerebrovascular structure and function, less is known about the mechanisms behind CeVD in other PA subpopulations. Proposed pathophysiologies include growth hormone deficiency inducing vessel wall damage or other hormone deficits causing increased atherosclerotic disease. Early diagnosis and treatment of PAs may be the key to minimizing lifetime CeVD risk elevations. More research is needed to better understand the mechanisms behind the increased CeVD seen in patients with PAs. Physicians caring for PA patients must remain vigilant for signs and symptoms of cerebrovascular disease in this patient population.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Glioblastoma remains resistant to most conventional treatments. Despite scientific advances in the past three decades, there has been a dearth of effective new treatments. New approaches to drug delivery and clinical trial design are needed. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss how the blood-brain barrier and tumor microenvironment pose challenges for development of effective therapies for glioblastoma. Next, we discuss treatments in development that aim to overcome these barriers, including novel drug designs such as nanoparticles and antibody-drug conjugates, novel methods of drug delivery, including convection-enhanced and intra-arterial delivery, and novel methods to enhance drug penetration, such as blood-brain barrier disruption by focused ultrasound and laser interstitial thermal therapy. Lastly, we address future opportunities, positing combination therapy as the best strategy for effective treatment, neoadjuvant and window-of-opportunity approaches to simultaneously enhance therapeutic effectiveness with interrogation of on-treatment biologic endpoints, and adaptive platform and basket trials as imperative for future trial design. New approaches to GBM treatment should account for the blood-brain barrier and immunosuppression by improving drug delivery, combining treatments, and integrating novel clinical trial designs.

Objective. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), which involves a surgical procedure to place electrodes directly on the vagus nerve (VN), is approved clinically for the treatment of epilepsy, depression, and to facilitate rehabilitation in stroke. VNS at surgically implanted electrodes is often limited by activation of motor nerve fibers near and within the VN that cause neck muscle contraction. In this study we investigated endovascular VNS that may allow activation of the VN at locations where the motor nerve fibers are not localized.Approach. We used endovascular electrodes within the nearby internal jugular vein (IJV) to electrically stimulate the VN while recording VN compound action potentials (CAPs) and neck muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in an acute intraoperative swine experiment.Main Results. We show that the stimulation electrode position within the IJV is critical for efficient activation of the VN. We also demonstrate use of fluoroscopy (cone beam CT mode) and ultrasound to determine the position of the endovascular stimulation electrode with respect to the VN and IJV. At the most effective endovascular stimulation locations tested, thresholds for VN activation were several times higher than direct stimulation of the nerve using a cuff electrode; however, this work demonstrates the feasibility of VNS with endovascular electrodes and provides tools to optimize endovascular electrode positions for VNS.Significance. This work lays the foundation to develop endovascular VNS strategies to stimulate at VN locations that would be otherwise too invasive and at VN locations where structures such as motor nerve fibers do not exist.