The aim of this study was to estimate parameters determining liver triglyceride composition (TC) using ¹ H MRS and to assess how TC estimability is affected by proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In this prospective single-site study, 199 adults with known or suspected NAFLD in whom other causes of liver disease were excluded underwent two ¹ H MRS STimulated Echo Acquisition Method (STEAM) sequences at 3 T. A respiratory-gated water-suppressed free breathing sequence (TE 10 ms, 16 signal averages) was used to assess TC in terms of the number of double bonds (ndb) and methylene-interrupted double bonds (nmidb), and a single breath-hold-long TR, multi-TE sequence (TR 3500 ms), which acquired five single average spectra over TE 10-30 ms, was used to estimate liver PDFF. Ndb and nmidb estimability was qualitatively assessed for each case and summarized descriptively. The consistency of ndb and nmidb estimation was examined using ROC analysis. The relationship between ndb and nmidb values and PDFF was presented graphically. Quality-of-fit of ndb and nmidb versus PDFF was evaluated by Pearson-r correlation. A significance level of 0.05 was used. In 263 ¹ H MRS examinations performed on 199 adult participants, ndb and nmidb were successfully estimated in 7/53 (13.2%) examinations with PDFF < 4%, 13/30 (43.3%) examinations with PDFF between 4% and 7%, 33/41 (80.5%) examinations with PDFF between 7% and 10%, and 124/139 (89.2%) examinations with PDFF > 10% (maximum PDFF 38.1%). Liver TC could be estimated consistently for PDFF > 6.7%. Both ndb and nmidb decreased with increasing PDFF (ndb = 2.83-0.0160·PDFF, r = -0.449, P < 0.0001); nmidb = 0.75-0.0088·PDFF, r = -0.350, P < 0.0001). In a cohort of adults with known or suspected NAFLD, liver TC becomes more saturated as PDFF increases.

Purpose

To compare agreement between region-of-interest (ROI)- and parametric map-based methods of hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimation in adults with known or suspected hepatic steatosis secondary to chronic liver disease over a range of imaging and analysis conditions.

Materials and methods

In this IRB approved HIPAA compliant prospective single-site study, 31 adults with chronic liver disease undergoing clinical gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T were recruited. Multi-echo gradient-echo imaging at flip angles of 10° and 50° was performed before and after administration of gadoxetic acid. Six echoes were acquired at successive nominally out-of-phase and in-phase echo times. PDFF was estimated with a nonlinear fitting algorithm using the first two, three, four, five, and (all) six echoes. Hence, 20 different imaging and analysis conditions were used (pre/post contrast x low/high flip angle x 2/3/4/5/6 echoes). For each condition, PDFF estimation was done in corresponding liver locations using two methods: a region-of-interest (ROI)-based method in which mean signal intensity values within ROIs were run through the fitting algorithm, and a parametric map-based method in which individual signal intensities were run through the fitting algorithm pixel by pixel. Agreement between ROI- and map-based PDFF estimation was assessed by Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis.

Results

Depending on the condition and method, PDFF ranged from -2.52% to 45.57%. Over all conditions, mean differences between ROI- and map-based PDFF estimates ranged from 0.04% to 0.24%, with all ICCs ≥0.999.

Conclusion

Agreement between ROI- and parametric map-based PDFF estimation is excellent over a wide range of imaging and analysis conditions.

Purpose

To assess and compare the accuracy of magnitude-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-M) and complex-based MRI (MRI-C) for estimating hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in children, using MR spectroscopy (MRS) as the reference standard. A secondary aim was to assess the agreement between MRI-M and MRI-C.

Materials and methods

This was a HIPAA-compliant, retrospective analysis of data collected in children enrolled in prospective, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved studies between 2012 and 2014. Informed consent was obtained from 200 children (ages 8-19 years) who subsequently underwent 3T MR exams that included MRI-M, MRI-C, and T₁ -independent, T₂ -corrected, single-voxel stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) MRS. Both MRI methods acquired six echoes at low flip angles. T2*-corrected PDFF parametric maps were generated. PDFF values were recorded from regions of interest (ROIs) drawn on the maps in each of the nine Couinaud segments and three ROIs colocalized to the MRS voxel location. Regression analyses assessing agreement with MRS were performed to evaluate the accuracy of each MRI method, and Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses were performed to assess agreement between the MRI methods.

Results

MRI-M and MRI-C PDFF were accurate relative to the colocalized MRS reference standard, with regression intercepts of 0.63% and -0.07%, slopes of 0.998 and 0.975, and proportion-of-explained-variance values (R² ) of 0.982 and 0.979, respectively. For individual Couinaud segments and for the whole liver averages, Bland-Altman biases between MRI-M and MRI-C were small (ranging from 0.04 to 1.11%) and ICCs were high (≥0.978).

Conclusion

Both MRI-M and MRI-C accurately estimated hepatic PDFF in children, and high intermethod agreement was observed.

Level of evidence

1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1641-1647.

To assess and compare the diagnostic performance of magnitude-reconstruction chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-M) and complex-reconstruction chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-C) for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in subjects with severe obesity without known non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), using contemporaneous histology as reference. This is an IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant, two-center, cross-sectional study of a larger prospective trail that recruited patients without known NAFLD consecutively between October 2010 and March 2015 to undergo research MRI exams 1-2 days prior to clinical-care weight-loss surgery. Proton denisty fat fraction (PDFF) was estimated using MRI-M and MRI-C. Liver biopsies were obtained intraoperatively. Using histologically-determined presence of steatosis as the reference standard, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were used to identify MRI-M- and MRI-C-derived PDFF thresholds for diagnosing steatosis. Bootstrapped-based tests were used to compare their diagnostic performace. A total of 81 patients (67 female, 14 maile, average age 48.2) were recruited for this study. MRI-M and MRI-C had areas under the ROC curve of 0.951 and 0.947, respectively, for diagnosing hepatic steatosis. for MRI-M, the Youden-index-based PDFF threshold of 6.5% provided 0.87 sensitivity (95% confidence internal: 0/75, 0.95), 0.96 specificity (0.81, 0.99), and 0.90 total accuracy (0.82, 0.96). For MRI-C, a PDFF threshold of 6.8%, provided a 0.90 sensitivity (0.77, 0.96), 0.96 specificity (0.81, 0.99), and 0.91 total accuracy (0.83, 0.97). Differences in performance parameters between MRI-M and MRI-C were not statistically significant. Conclusion: MRI-M- and MRI-C-derived PDFF is accurate for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in subjects with severe obesity.