BACKGROUND:
Hard and soft tissue LASERs continue to gain popularity in dentistry. Most published literature on enamel and dentin bond strength after LASER use were carried out utilizing Er:YAG, ErCr:YSGG and 10.6µm CO2 LASER, respectively. The LASER bond strength literature lacks studies using a 9.3 µm short-pulsed CO2 LASER.
OBJECTIVES:
The objective of this study was to test, whether 9.3 μm short-pulsed CO2 LASER irradiation has an influence on the bond strength of human enamel following different LASER treatments for pit and fissure sealants as well as for composite restoration placements in a laboratory study in comparison to non-LASER treated enamel by measuring the bond strength of a total-etch adhesive system, using shear-bond strength testing 24 hours after flowable composite placement.
METHODS:
The laboratory study was carried out in four stages. Stage 1 of the study was performed on bovine enamel, and stage 2 was carried out on human enamel samples, respectively. For stage 1 and 2 samples were “hand irradiated” while in stage 3 a computer controlled motor-driven stage was used to move the sample while irradiating with the CO2 LASER. Stage 4 was used as negative control comparing LASER treatment alone without etching to a no-etched control.
In the first three stages, the control group was treated with 37% phosphoric acid-etch (Scotchbond™ Universal etchant, 3M™ ESPE™, St. Paul, MN) and bonded with Adper Single Bond Plus (3M™ ESPE™, St. Paul, MN) followed by the placement of Z250 Filtek™ supreme flowable composite (3M™ ESPE™, St. Paul, MN). The test group samples were treated with a short-pulsed 9.3 µm CO2 LASER (Solea, Convergent Dental, Inc., Natick, MA) at different energy settings followed by total-etch bonding. After debonding of the composite with the UltraTester™ (Ultradent™ Products, Inc., South Jordan, UT), the shear-bond strength values were compared between the groups with ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison tests.
RESULTS:
The bovine treatment groups showed an increase in shear-bond strength in comparison to the non-irradiated control group. However, statistically the increased bond strength values were not significantly different. LASER hand irradiation on human enamel showed an increase in shear-bond strength by 27.4%. LASER irradiation treatment using a stage motor showed an increase in shear-bond strength by 20.2%. Those differences were statistically significant for some of the treatment groups. The negative control groups with no etching after LASER treatment showed a significant, 79.5% reduced shear-bond strength in comparison to the total-etch control group.
CONCLUSION:
The study results suggest that when used with total-etch technique and 3M™ ESPE™ Adper Single Bond Plus, SOLEA 9.3 µm short-pulsed CO2 LASER treatment increases composite shear-bond strength to enamel by up to 27.4% in comparison to non-LASER treated enamel. Using the LASER settings for caries prevention resulted in the highest shear-bond strength increase. The study also showed that CO2 LASER treatment by itself is not a substitute for acid etching. In conclusion, when SOLEA 9.3 µm short-pulsed CO2 LASER irradiation is used to render enamel caries-resistant, the shear-bond strength of the dental sealant to the enamel is increased.