BACKGROUND: Older adults aged ≥65 years old represent an increasing proportion of tuberculosis (TB) cases in the United States, but limited evidence exists on the characteristics and treatment outcomes that differentiate them from younger adults. METHODS: We evaluated Alameda County TB surveillance data from 2016 to 2019 and abstracted public health charts for older adult TB cases. Clinical presentation and treatment outcomes were compared in older and younger adults (15-64 years), and multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess risk factors for TB treatment noncompletion among older adults. RESULTS: Of 517 TB cases, 172 (33.2%) were older adults and 101 were ≥75 years old. Compared to younger adults, older TB cases were more likely to be non-US-born, and have diabetes. For diagnosis, older adults were more likely to have negative interferon-gamma release assays (24.6% vs 16.0%; P = .01) and were less likely to have cavitary disease (18.6% vs 26.7%; P < .001). One third of older adults experienced an adverse event; older adults were less likely to complete TB treatment (77.7% vs 88.4%; P = .002) and were more likely to die during TB treatment (16.3% vs 2.9%; P < .01), especially among those ≥75 years old, who had a mortality rate of 22.9%. In multivariable analysis, dementia was significantly associated with treatment noncompletion (adjusted odds ratio, 5.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-20.32; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes, negative diagnostic tests, and poor treatment outcomes were more prevalent in older adult TB cases. A greater understanding of their TB presentation and comorbidities will inform interventions to improve outcomes among older adults.

Background

Risk factors differentiating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) infections in the pediatric community have been unclear.

Methods

We performed a prospective case-comparison investigation of clinical, epidemiological, and molecular factors in pediatric community-associated (CA) MRSA and MSSA cases in the San Francisco Bay Area. Chart reviews were conducted in 270 CA-MRSA and 313 CA-MSSA cases. Fifty-eight CA-MRSA (21.4%) and 95 CA-MSSA (30.4%) cases were interviewed. Molecular typing was performed on 111 isolates.

Results

MSSA represented 53.7% of CA cases and was more likely to cause invasive disease (6.2% vs 1.1%, P = .004). Few potential epidemiologic risk factors distinguished CA-MRSA from CA-MSSA. No differences were found in factors related to crowding, cleanliness, or prior antibiotic use. Compromised skin integrity due to eczema (24.3% vs 13.5%, P = .001) was associated with CA-MSSA. Many exposures to potentially infected or colonized contacts or contaminated objects were assessed; only three were associated with CA-MSSA: having a household contact who had surgery in the past year (18.9% vs 6.0%, P = .02), and regular visits to a public shower (9.1% vs 2.0%, P = .01) or gym (12.6% vs 3.3%, P = .04). Molecular typing identified clonal complex 8 as the predominant genetic lineage among CA-MRSA (96.4%) and CA-MSSA (39.3%) isolates.

Conclusions

In the context of recent heightened focus on CA-MRSA, the burden of serious disease caused by CA-MSSA among children should not be overlooked. MRSA and MSSA may be growing epidemiologically similar; thus, research, clinical, and public health efforts should focus on S aureus as a single entity.

CONTEXT: Patients with culture-negative pulmonary TB (PTB) can face delays in diagnosis that worsen outcomes and lead to ongoing transmission. An understanding of current trends and characteristics of culture-negative PTB can support earlier detection and access to care. OBJECTIVE: Describe epidemiology of culture-negative PTB. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We utilized Alameda County TB surveillance data from 2010 to 2019. Culture-negative PTB cases met clinical but not laboratory criteria for PTB per US National Tuberculosis Surveillance System definitions. We calculated trends in annual incidence and proportion of culture-negative PTB using Poisson and weighted linear regression, respectively. We further compared demographic and clinical characteristics among culture-negative versus culture-positive PTB cases. RESULTS: During 2010-2019, there were 870 cases of PTB, of which 152 (17%) were culture-negative. The incidence of culture-negative PTB declined by 76%, from 1.9/100 000 to 0.46/100 000 ( P for trend <.01), while the incidence of culture-positive PTB reduced by 37% (6.5/100 000 to 4.1/100 000, P for trend =.1). Culture-negative PTB case-patients were more likely than culture-positive PTB case-patients to be younger (7.9% were children <15 years old vs 1.1%; P < .01), recent immigrants within 5 years of arrival (38.2% vs 25.5%; P < .01), and have a TB contact (11.2% vs 2.9%; P < .01). Culture-negative PTB case-patients were less likely than culture-positive PTB case-patients to be evaluated because of TB symptoms (57.2% vs 74.7%; P < .01) or have cavitation on chest imaging (13.1% vs 38.8%; P < .01). At the same time culture-negative PTB case-patients were less likely to die during TB treatment (2.0% vs 9.6%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of culture-negative PTB disproportionately declined compared with culture-positive TB and raises concern for gaps in detection. Expansion of screening programs for recent immigrants and TB contacts and greater recognition of risk factors may increase detection of culture-negative PTB.