When a vertical test stimulus is presented
simultaneously within a surrounding stimulus of
orientation 10-30° clockwise from vertical, the test
stimulus appears slightly counter-clockwise from
vertical. In contrast, when the surrounding stimulus
is 60-80° clockwise from vertical, the test stimulus
appears slightly clockwise from vertical. Lateral
inhibition between orientation-selective neurons can
account for the former effect (repulsion), but not for
the latter effect (attraction). H o w e v e r , if an
orthogonal "virtual axis" is also present and exerts its
o w n lateral inhibition, both effects can be accounted
for. A mathematical m o d e l demonstrates
quantitatively h o w this m a y occur in the visual
system. O n e simulation with narrowly tuned
orientation-selectivity functions produced tilt
illusions of similar magnitude to that observed with
h u m a n s at normal presentation durations. A
simulation with m o r e broadly tuned functions
produced tilt illusions of m u c h greater magnitude, as
are found with h u m a n s at very short presentation
durations. Based on the model's performance, h u m a n
performance and neurophysiological data, it is
suggested that: 1) lateral inhibition m a y be the
immediate cause of both direct and indirect tilt
illusions, and 2) the "virtual axis" m a y be a real
neural mechanism and m a y be found in greater
proportion in extrastriate cortex than in striate cortex.