Background

Racism is a longstanding driver of health inequities. Although medical education is a potential solution to address racism in health care, best practices remain unknown.

Objective

We sought to evaluate the impact of participation in a curriculum addressing racism on pediatric residents' racial biases and empathy.

Methods

A pre-post survey study was conducted in 2 urban, university-based, midsized pediatric residency programs between July 2019 and June 2020. The curriculum sessions included Self-Reflection on Implicit Bias, Historical Trauma, and Structural Racism. All sessions were paired with empathy and perspective-taking exercises and were conducted in small groups to facilitate reflective discussion. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to assess changes in racial bias and empathy. Linear regression was used to assess the effect of resident characteristics on racial bias and empathy.

Results

Ninety of 111 residents receiving the curriculum completed pre-surveys (81.1%), and among those, 65 completed post-surveys (72.2%). Among participants with baseline pro-White bias, there was a statistically significant shift (0.46 to 0.36, P=.02) toward no preference. Among participants with a baseline pro-Black bias, there was a statistically significant shift (-0.38 to -0.21, P=.02), toward no preference. Among participants with baseline pro-White explicit bias, there was a statistically significant shift (0.54 to 0.30, P<.001) toward no preference. Among all residents, there was a modest but statistically significant decrease in mean empathy (22.95 to 22.42, P=.03).

Conclusions

Participation in a longitudinal discussion-based curriculum addressing racism modestly reduced pediatric residents' racial preferences with minimal effects on empathy scales.

INTRODUCTION: Millennial trainees prefer innovative, multimodal education on topics including the physical exam (PE). Attendings inconsistently meet these needs on family-centered rounds. To enhance PE teaching, a Web site (PEToolkit) was created, but its use was infrequent. We aimed to increase PEToolkit use from 2 to 5 page counts per week in 7 months. METHODS: This quality improvement project took place at a large academic center in 1 Hospital Medicine team. Key drivers informed interventions, and an annotated run chart tracked progress. We tracked secondary measures, including changes in perception of teaching skill among attendings and resident-observed methods of PE teaching, through survey methodology. RESULTS: Median page counts increased to 5 counts per week in 7 months. The most impactful interventions included training senior residents to teach with the PEToolkit Web site and team feedback on Web site usage midweek. Survey responses from 37 attendings showed that those with more exposure to PEToolkit had increased self-perceived skill of PE teaching (P = 0.02). Survey responses from 52 residents showed that those on the intervention team reported more use of video for PE teaching (P < 0.001) and higher frequency of PE teaching (P = 0.02), compared with those on the nonintervention team. CONCLUSIONS: We increased PEToolkit Web site use during family-centered rounds, thereby emphasizing the importance of PE teaching in this setting in an innovative way. Engagement of learners, frequent feedback, and coaching should be considered when incorporating technology in teaching.