- Tota, Joseph E;
- Struyf, Frank;
- Sampson, Joshua N;
- Gonzalez, Paula;
- Ryser, Martin;
- Herrero, Rolando;
- Schussler, John;
- Karkada, Naveen;
- Rodriguez, Ana Cecilia;
- Folschweiller, Nicolas;
- Porras, Carolina;
- Schiffman, Mark;
- Schiller, John T;
- Quint, Wim;
- Kreimer, Aimée R;
- Wheeler, Cosette M;
- Hildesheim, Allan;
- Cortés, Bernal;
- González, Paula;
- Jiménez, Silvia E;
- Rodríguez, Ana Cecilia;
- Lowy, Douglas R;
- Wacholder, Sholom;
- Pinto, Ligia A;
- Kemp, Troy J;
- van Doorn, Leen-Jan;
- Struijk, Linda;
- Palefsky, Joel M;
- Darragh, Teresa M;
- Stoler, Mark H;
- Garland, SM;
- Skinner, SR;
- De Sutter, P;
- Poppe, WAJ;
- De Carvalho, NS;
- Teixeira, JC;
- Ferguson, L;
- Ferguson, M;
- Papp, K;
- Ramjattan, B;
- Orr, PH;
- Paavonen, J;
- Höpker, WD;
- Tobgui, S Jensen-El;
- Liverani, CA;
- Limson, GM;
- Marti, M Campins;
- Castro, M;
- Centeno, C;
- Chow, SN;
- Angsuwathana, S;
- Lewis, D;
- Ackerman, R;
- Caldwell, M;
- Chambers, C;
- Chatterjee, A;
- Harper, D;
- Sperling, R;
- Stapleton, J;
- Waldbaum, A;
- Lee, P;
- Awedikian, Rafi
Background
The AS04-adjuvanted HPV16/18 (AS04-HPV16/18) vaccine provides excellent protection against targeted human papillomavirus (HPV) types and a variable degree of cross-protection against others, including types 6/11/31/33/45. High efficacy against any cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or greater (CIN3+; >90%) suggests that lower levels of protection may exist for a wide range of oncogenic HPV types, which is difficult to quantify in individual trials. Pooling individual-level data from two randomized controlled trials, we aimed to evaluate AS04-HPV16/18 vaccine efficacy against incident HPV infections and cervical abnormalities .Methods
Data were available from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (NCT00128661) and Papilloma Trial Against Cancer in Young Adults trial (NCT00122681), two large-scale, double-blind randomized controlled trials of the AS04-HPV16/18 vaccine. Primary analyses focused on disease-free women with no detectable cervicovaginal HPV at baseline.Results
A total of 12 550 women were included in our primary analyses (HPV arm = 6271, control arm = 6279). Incidence of 6-month persistent oncogenic and nononcogenic infections, excluding known and accepted protected types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45 (focusing on 34/35/39/40/42/43/44/51/52/53/54/56/58/59/66/68/73/70/74), was statistically significantly lower in the HPV arm than in the control arm (efficacy = 9.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7% to 17.4%). Statistically significant efficacy (P < .05) was observed for individual oncogenic types 16/18/31/33/45/52 and nononcogenic types 6/11/53/74. Efficacy against cervical abnormalities (all types) increased with severity, ranging from 27.7% (95% CI = 21.7% to 33.3%) to 58.7% (95% CI = 34.1% to 74.7%) for cytologic outcomes (low-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia lesion or greater, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia lesion or greater, respectively) and 66.0% (95% CI = 54.4% to 74.9%) to 87.8% (95% CI = 71.1% to 95.7%) for histologic outcomes (CIN2+ and CIN3+, respectively). Comparing Costa Rica Vaccine Trial and Papilloma Trial Against Cancer in Young Adults results, there was no evidence of heterogeneity, except for type 51 (efficacy = -28.6% and 20.7%, respectively; two-sided P = .03).Conclusions
The AS04-HPV16/18 vaccine provides some additional cross-protection beyond established protected types, which partially explains the high efficacy against CIN3+.