Background

We sought to determine whether management of LDL-C following invasive angiography and assessment by fractional flow reserve (FFR) differs between those with obstructive vs non-obstructive CAD.

Methods

Retrospective study of 721 patients undergoing coronary angiography involving assessment by FFR between 2013 and 2020 at a single academic center. Groups with obstructive vs non-obstructive CAD by index angiographic and FFR findings were compared over 1 year of follow-up.

Results

Based on index angiographic and FFR findings, 421 (58%) patients had obstructive CAD vs 300 (42%) with non-obstructive CAD, mean (±SD) age 66±11 years, 217 (30%) women, and 594 (82%) white. There was no difference in baseline LDL-C. At 3-months follow-up, LDL-C was lower than baseline in both groups, with no between group difference. In contrast, at 6-months, median (Q1, Q3) LDL-C was significantly higher in non-obstructive vs obstructive CAD (LDL-C 73 (60, 93) vs 63 (48, 77) mg/dL, respectively (p = 0.003), (p = 0.001 in multivariable linear regression)). At 12-months, LDL-C remained higher in non-obstructive vs obstructive CAD (LDL-C 73 (49, 86) vs 64 (48, 79) mg/dL, respectively, although not statistically significant (p = 0.104)). The rate of high-intensity statin use was lower among those with non-obstructive CAD vs obstructive CAD at all time points (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

After coronary angiography involving FFR, there is intensification of LDL-C lowering at 3-months follow-up in both obstructive and non-obstructive CAD. However, by 6-months follow-up LDL-C is significantly higher among those with non-obstructive CAD vs obstructive CAD. Following coronary angiography involving FFR, patients with non-obstructive CAD may benefit from greater attention to LDL-C lowering to reduce residual ASCVD risk.

Background

Parkinson disease (PD) psychosis (PDP) is a disabling non-motor symptom. Pharmacologic treatment is limited to pimavanserin, quetiapine, and clozapine, which do not worsen parkinsonism. A Food and Drug Administration black box warning exists for antipsychotics, suggesting increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia. However, the reasons for higher mortality are unknown.

Aim

Expanding on prior work exploring mortality in treated PDP patients, we conducted a retrospective comparison to understand the links between treatment regimen, clinical characteristics, and negative outcomes.

Methods

Electronic medical record data extraction included clinically diagnosed PD patients between 4/29/16-4/29/19 and excluded patients with primary psychiatric diagnoses or atypical parkinsonism. Mortality and clinical characteristics during the study period were compared between untreated patients and those receiving pimavanserin, quetiapine, or both agents (combination). Mortality analyses were adjusted for age, sex, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and dementia.

Results

The pimavanserin group (n = 34) had lower mortality than the untreated group (n = 66) (odds ratio = 0.171, 95% confidence interval: 0.025-0.676, p = 0.026). The untreated group had similar mortality compared to the quetiapine (n = 147) and combination (n = 68) groups. All treated groups had a higher LEDD compared to the untreated group, but no other differences in demographics, hospitalizations, medical comorbidities, medications, or laboratory values were found between the untreated and treated groups.

Conclusions

PDP patients receiving pimavanserin had lower mortality than untreated patients. We found no other clear differences in clinical characteristics to explain the mortality risk. Prospective randomized trials are needed to definitively identify the optimal PDP treatment regimen and associated risks.