HVAC Systems
Parent: Center for the Built Environment
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for May through August, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4db4q37h | Web application for thermal comfort visualization and calculation according to ASHRAE Standard 55 | 280 | 63 | 217 | 22.5% |
| 4p479663 | Ceiling fans: Predicting indoor air speeds based on full scale laboratory measurements | 181 | 87 | 94 | 48.1% |
| 5w53c7kr | Simplified calculation method for design cooling loads in underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems | 173 | 62 | 111 | 35.8% |
| 2c58r8qm | Energy savings from temperature setpoints and deadband: Quantifying the influence of building and system properties on savings | 149 | 8 | 141 | 5.4% |
| 8m88d92j | Hot Water Heating: Design and Retrofit Guide | 146 | 44 | 102 | 30.1% |
| 3fh0x2vm | Reducing Gas Consumption in Existing Large Commercial Buildings | 144 | 39 | 105 | 27.1% |
| 13h9z4gg | Comparison of construction and energy costs for radiant vs. VAV systems in the California Bay Area | 133 | 30 | 103 | 22.6% |
| 6k4369zv | Boiler Retrofits and Decarbonization in Existing Buildings: HVAC Designer Interviews | 131 | 21 | 110 | 16.0% |
| 4ph1m7t5 | Introduction of a Cooling Fan Efficiency Index | 127 | 44 | 83 | 34.6% |
| 6px642bj | Cooling load calculations for radiant systems: are they the same traditional methods? | 118 | 8 | 110 | 6.8% |
| 0tp7v717 | Natural vs. mechanical ventilation and cooling. | 109 | 71 | 38 | 65.1% |
| 6b9590qr | Variable Air Volume Hot Water Reheat Terminal Units: Temperature Stratification, Performance at Low Hot Water Supply Temperature, and Myths from the Field | 105 | 73 | 32 | 69.5% |
| 2qd7r5mp | Fans for cooling people guidebook | 99 | 42 | 57 | 42.4% |
| 2924w2j7 | Variable Air Volume Hot Water Reheat Terminal Units: Temperature Stratification, Performance at Low Hot Water Supply Temperature, and Myths from the Field | 93 | 0 | 93 | 0.0% |
| 5sj3h2s5 | New method for the design of radiant floor cooling systems with solar radiation | 93 | 33 | 60 | 35.5% |
| 75j1m967 | Artificial Intelligence for Efficient Thermal Comfort Systems: Requirements, Current Applications and Future Directions | 93 | 25 | 68 | 26.9% |
| 3qs8f8qx | Quantifying energy losses in hot water reheat systems | 92 | 22 | 70 | 23.9% |
| 1vb3d1j8 | Thermal comfort in buildings using radiant vs. all-air systems: A critical literature review | 86 | 33 | 53 | 38.4% |
| 6kj9t7cj | Effects of Diffuser Airflow Minima on Occupant Comfort, Air Mixing, and Building Energy Use (RP-1515) | 82 | 48 | 34 | 58.5% |
| 7jh6m9sx | Cooling load differences between radiant and air systems | 82 | 30 | 52 | 36.6% |
| 85x6r3wv | A review of advanced air distribution methods - theory, practice, limitations and solutions | 81 | 14 | 67 | 17.3% |
| 8cj7n6ps | Ceiling-fan-integrated air conditioning: Airflow and temperature characteristics of a sidewall-supply jet interacting with a ceiling fan | 81 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% |
| 46h4h28q | Measured Space Heating Hot Water Distribution Losses in Large Commercial Buildings | 79 | 32 | 47 | 40.5% |
| 6qc4p0fr | Design and Control of Hydronic Radiant Cooling Systems | 79 | 24 | 55 | 30.4% |
| 7bf4g0k1 | Influence of raised floor on zone design cooling load in commercial buildings. | 78 | 38 | 40 | 48.7% |
| 1fk2m3v6 | Evaluation of a cost-responsive supply air temperature reset strategy in an office building | 77 | 56 | 21 | 72.7% |
| 3jn5m7kg | Thermal and air quality acceptability in buildings that reduce energy by reducing minimun airflow from overhead diffusers | 68 | 25 | 43 | 36.8% |
| 5tz4n92b | A new control strategy for high thermal mass radiant systems | 68 | 24 | 44 | 35.3% |
| 1jh193x3 | VAV Reheat Versus Active Chilled Beams and DOAS | 67 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% |
| 2j75g92w | A novel classification scheme for design and control of radiant system based on thermal response time | 67 | 38 | 29 | 56.7% |
| 34f0h35q | Energy Performance of Commercial Buildings with Radiant Heating and Cooling | 65 | 25 | 40 | 38.5% |
| 7n6893n6 | Heating Hot Water Distribution Heat Losses: Detailed Measurement | 64 | 37 | 27 | 57.8% |
| 7sf76298 | Heating Hot Water Policy Recommendations | 64 | 28 | 36 | 43.8% |
| 2d656203 | Air movement as an energy efficient means toward occupant comfort | 63 | 10 | 53 | 15.9% |
| 8r07k5g3 | Cooling capacity and acoustic performance of radiant slab systems with free-hanging acoustical clouds | 63 | 31 | 32 | 49.2% |
| 4hs7f29b | Underfloor air distribution (UFAD) cost study: analysis of first cost tradeoffs in UFAD systems | 62 | 20 | 42 | 32.3% |
| 23t9k6rm | Changing the Rules: Innovative Low-Energy Occupant-Responsive HVAC Controls and Systems | 61 | 12 | 49 | 19.7% |
| 9qm3670s | Simulation of radiant cooling performance with evaporative cooling sources | 61 | 26 | 35 | 42.6% |
| 6gz10718 | Screening Method to Identify High VAV Minimum Airflow Rates and Retrofit Opportunities | 59 | 36 | 23 | 61.0% |
| 5v60x57q | Outlook for underfloor air distribution | 58 | 36 | 22 | 62.1% |
| 12z3z69c | A Prototype Toolkit For Evaluating Indoor Environmental Quality In Commercial Buildings | 57 | 26 | 31 | 45.6% |
| 1rk582x1 | HVAC system energy optimization using an adaptive hybrid metaheuristic | 57 | 36 | 21 | 63.2% |
| 6qx027rh | Optimizing Radiant Systems for Energy Efficiency and Comfort | 56 | 26 | 30 | 46.4% |
| 6x3731q2 | Underfloor vs. overhead: a comparative analysis of air distribution systems using the EnergyPlus simulation software | 56 | 44 | 12 | 78.6% |
| 80h2t038 | Effect of acoustical clouds coverage and air movement on radiant chilled ceiling cooling capacity | 56 | 26 | 30 | 46.4% |
| 8x98n5hj | Field study of the impact of a desktop task/ambient conditioning system in office buildings | 55 | 22 | 33 | 40.0% |
| 2bb1c9t0 | Hype vs. reality: new research findings on underfloor air distribution systems | 54 | 43 | 11 | 79.6% |
| 3j52t8vz | Radiant cooling research scoping study | 54 | 17 | 37 | 31.5% |
| 67d6j5qm | Multi-sensor single-actuator control of HVAC systems | 54 | 31 | 23 | 57.4% |
| 7k1796zv | SinBerBEST Technology Energy Assessment Report | 54 | 27 | 27 | 50.0% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.