Earthquake Engineering
Parent: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UCLA
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for June through September, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8fm3h6rj | Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for a Dam Site in Calabria (Southern Italy) | 198 | 73 | 125 | 36.9% |
| 4pw1r476 | Implications of California vertical array data for the analysis of site response with 1D geotechnical modeling | 189 | 89 | 100 | 47.1% |
| 0r59p7bk | Site response in NEHRP Provisions and NGA models | 145 | 38 | 107 | 26.2% |
| 8374p3d3 | Development of geologic site classes for seismic site amplification for central and eastern North America | 145 | 33 | 112 | 22.8% |
| 9m8075g1 | NGA-Subduction site database | 145 | 41 | 104 | 28.3% |
| 3mr1w33t | Engineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motion Coherency and Amplitude Variability | 144 | 39 | 105 | 27.1% |
| 1hc2543n | Radiation Damping of Shallow Foundations on Nonlinear Soil Medium | 143 | 23 | 120 | 16.1% |
| 8mk017th | Kinematic soil-structure interaction effects from building and free-field seismic arrays in Japan | 140 | 31 | 109 | 22.1% |
| 8602788p | Dynamic field fest of a model levee founded on peaty organic soil using an eccentric mass shaker | 134 | 21 | 113 | 15.7% |
| 49d460v7 | Development of NGA-Subduction database | 129 | 45 | 84 | 34.9% |
| 9dj3t2fc | Critical evaluation of Italian strong motion data and comparison to NGA ground motion prediction equations | 123 | 27 | 96 | 22.0% |
| 1963r6jf | Site effects in parametric ground motion models for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project | 121 | 29 | 92 | 24.0% |
| 019523j6 | Assessment of soil-structure interaction modeling strategies for response history analysis of buildings | 115 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% |
| 4qh4g53z | Remote monitoring of a model levee constructed on soft peaty organic soil | 103 | 15 | 88 | 14.6% |
| 6pn9s2hg | Selection of a Global Set of GMPEs for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project | 97 | 20 | 77 | 20.6% |
| 5t73x5tj | Incorporating Soil-Structure Interaction intoSeismic Response Analyses for Buildings | 96 | 11 | 85 | 11.5% |
| 4nm9q7ps | Probabilistic versus Deterministic Implementation of Nonlinear Site Factors in Seismic Hazard | 95 | 23 | 72 | 24.2% |
| 9pz1x513 | Implications of California Vertical Array Data for Modeling of Non-Ergodic Site Response | 94 | 21 | 73 | 22.3% |
| 2k73b70c | Comparison of ground motion attributes from 2011 Tohoku-oki mainshock and two subsequent events | 93 | 26 | 67 | 28.0% |
| 6v9844m7 | ENGINEERING RECONNAISSANCE FOLLOWING THE AUGUST 24, 2016M6.0 CENTRAL ITALY EARTHQUAKE | 89 | 28 | 61 | 31.5% |
| 9zx5m1kc | Groundwater level evaluation for river flood control levees and its effect on seismic performance | 89 | 26 | 63 | 29.2% |
| 86p6n9hg | Ground motion estimation for evaluation of levee performance in past earthquakes | 80 | 17 | 63 | 21.3% |
| 64x0k6zd | Measurements of dynamic impedance for a model levee on peat | 74 | 18 | 56 | 24.3% |
| 1db101h6 | Applicability of levee fragility functions developed from Japanese data to California’s Central Valley | 72 | 0 | 72 | 0.0% |
| 8b43q93s | Finite Element Modeling of Shallow Foundations on Nonlinear Soil Medium | 67 | 30 | 37 | 44.8% |
| 796433tx | Implementation of 1D Ground Response Analysis in Probabilistic Assessments of Ground Shaking Potential | 51 | 21 | 30 | 41.2% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.