Earthquake Engineering
Parent: UCLA Civil and Environmental Engineering
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1hc2543n | Radiation Damping of Shallow Foundations on Nonlinear Soil Medium | 107 | 16 | 91 | 15.0% |
| 8b43q93s | Finite Element Modeling of Shallow Foundations on Nonlinear Soil Medium | 78 | 12 | 66 | 15.4% |
| 3mr1w33t | Engineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motion Coherency and Amplitude Variability | 77 | 21 | 56 | 27.3% |
| 9m8075g1 | NGA-Subduction site database | 70 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% |
| 4pw1r476 | Implications of California vertical array data for the analysis of site response with 1D geotechnical modeling | 69 | 5 | 64 | 7.2% |
| 8fm3h6rj | Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for a Dam Site in Calabria (Southern Italy) | 69 | 18 | 51 | 26.1% |
| 8mk017th | Kinematic soil-structure interaction effects from building and free-field seismic arrays in Japan | 69 | 23 | 46 | 33.3% |
| 019523j6 | Assessment of soil-structure interaction modeling strategies for response history analysis of buildings | 66 | 17 | 49 | 25.8% |
| 8374p3d3 | Development of geologic site classes for seismic site amplification for central and eastern North America | 64 | 11 | 53 | 17.2% |
| 1db101h6 | Applicability of levee fragility functions developed from Japanese data to California’s Central Valley | 62 | 0 | 62 | 0.0% |
| 49d460v7 | Development of NGA-Subduction database | 59 | 13 | 46 | 22.0% |
| 0r59p7bk | Site response in NEHRP Provisions and NGA models | 58 | 11 | 47 | 19.0% |
| 5t73x5tj | Incorporating Soil-Structure Interaction intoSeismic Response Analyses for Buildings | 58 | 7 | 51 | 12.1% |
| 6v9844m7 | ENGINEERING RECONNAISSANCE FOLLOWING THE AUGUST 24, 2016M6.0 CENTRAL ITALY EARTHQUAKE | 58 | 14 | 44 | 24.1% |
| 9dj3t2fc | Critical evaluation of Italian strong motion data and comparison to NGA ground motion prediction equations | 56 | 14 | 42 | 25.0% |
| 796433tx | Implementation of 1D Ground Response Analysis in Probabilistic Assessments of Ground Shaking Potential | 52 | 8 | 44 | 15.4% |
| 9pz1x513 | Implications of California Vertical Array Data for Modeling of Non-Ergodic Site Response | 52 | 7 | 45 | 13.5% |
| 4qh4g53z | Remote monitoring of a model levee constructed on soft peaty organic soil | 51 | 7 | 44 | 13.7% |
| 6pn9s2hg | Selection of a Global Set of GMPEs for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project | 46 | 4 | 42 | 8.7% |
| 9zx5m1kc | Groundwater level evaluation for river flood control levees and its effect on seismic performance | 44 | 8 | 36 | 18.2% |
| 1963r6jf | Site effects in parametric ground motion models for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project | 41 | 4 | 37 | 9.8% |
| 2k73b70c | Comparison of ground motion attributes from 2011 Tohoku-oki mainshock and two subsequent events | 41 | 6 | 35 | 14.6% |
| 4nm9q7ps | Probabilistic versus Deterministic Implementation of Nonlinear Site Factors in Seismic Hazard | 41 | 7 | 34 | 17.1% |
| 64x0k6zd | Measurements of dynamic impedance for a model levee on peat | 38 | 4 | 34 | 10.5% |
| 86p6n9hg | Ground motion estimation for evaluation of levee performance in past earthquakes | 36 | 6 | 30 | 16.7% |
| 8602788p | Dynamic field fest of a model levee founded on peaty organic soil using an eccentric mass shaker | 35 | 11 | 24 | 31.4% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.