California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
Parent: UC Berkeley
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for July through October, 2024
Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6bx133h8 | Keeping the lights on: the Oakland EcoBlock community electrification and microgrid improves health, comfort and resilience in an urban neighborhood | 200 | 32 | 168 | 16.0% |
02c6h0sm | WECC Wind Generator Development | 196 | 25 | 171 | 12.8% |
2nh0h4nb | Persistence of Energy Efficiency Behaviors over Time: Evidence from a Community-Based Program | 161 | 21 | 140 | 13.0% |
1qm749nx | Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the San Francisco Bay Area | 136 | 60 | 76 | 44.1% |
35k1861z | Biomethane from Dairy Waste, a Sourcebook for the Production and Use of Renewable Natural Gas | 128 | 38 | 90 | 29.7% |
63k9r489 | Behavior-Based Energy Efficiency: A Case Study of the Oakland EcoBlock Final Project Report | 126 | 33 | 93 | 26.2% |
76w3m09c | Development of Fault Current Controller Technology | 114 | 33 | 81 | 28.9% |
0696v9nb | Social Vulnerability to Climate Change in California | 113 | 27 | 86 | 23.9% |
17582969 | Estimating Risk to California Energy Infrastructure from Projected Climate Change | 111 | 44 | 67 | 39.6% |
9qx629fh | Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerabilities, and Adaptation in the San Francisco Bay Area: A Synthesis of PIER Program Reports and Other Relevant Research | 97 | 34 | 63 | 35.1% |
4z76h1cn | Oscillation Detection and Analysis | 96 | 33 | 63 | 34.4% |
1bs0h6pk | Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change in California Agriculture | 95 | 46 | 49 | 48.4% |
81x1c1t5 | Challenges to the Integration of Renewable Resources at High System Penetration | 94 | 36 | 58 | 38.3% |
09s3h0t6 | Zenergy Power Corporate Fact Sheet | 89 | 36 | 53 | 40.4% |
2267w31c | Number and propagation of line outages in cascading events in electric power transmission systems | 88 | 2 | 86 | 2.3% |
1s88n8c6 | White Paper: The EcoBlock Project and the “Own Use” Exemption under Public Utilities Code Section 218 – A Way Forward for Privately Operated Microgrids | 87 | 12 | 75 | 13.8% |
2zd3m0kr | Cool Colored Cars to Reduce Air-Conditioning Energy Use and reduce CO2 Emission | 85 | 41 | 44 | 48.2% |
3q9849pc | Electric Distribution System Simulation and Analysis Tools: Status and Research Gaps for Integration of Renewables and Electric Vehicles | 85 | 21 | 64 | 24.7% |
5bk6h3pq | Distribution Monitoring for Renewables Integration | 85 | 14 | 71 | 16.5% |
9c0618tq | Climate Change: Challenges And Solutions For California Agricultural Landscapes | 76 | 32 | 44 | 42.1% |
5wd1797m | Fire and Climate Change in California: Changes in the Distribution and Frequency of Fire in Climates of the Future and Recent Past (1911-2099) | 74 | 30 | 44 | 40.5% |
7kt682n7 | Residential HVAC and Distribution Research Implementation | 74 | 6 | 68 | 8.1% |
1vc2q811 | Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation in San Francisco Bay: Results from Case Studies | 72 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% |
3t2160dp | Adaptation Strategies for Agricultural Sustainability in Yolo County, California | 72 | 39 | 33 | 54.2% |
3vp1c1p8 | Assessment Of Household Carbon Footprint Reduction Potentials | 72 | 41 | 31 | 56.9% |
7w92d9v7 | Building Energy Efficient Communities: A Research Agenda for California | 72 | 43 | 29 | 59.7% |
2w9962wn | Mapping Climate Change Exposures, Vulnerabilities, and Adaptation to Public Health Risks in the San Francisco Bay and Fresno Regions | 71 | 29 | 42 | 40.8% |
0jp4w9hq | The Impacts of Sea Level Rise on the San Francisco Bay | 70 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% |
49v0n1n2 | Climate Change and Wildfire in and Around California: Fire Modeling and Loss Modeling | 70 | 16 | 54 | 22.9% |
8vw23703 | Market Structure and Energy Efficiency:The Case of New Commercial Buildings | 69 | 21 | 48 | 30.4% |
99k3736h | WECC Wind Power Plant Power Flow Modeling Guide | 69 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% |
3jb1n7fk | Evaluation Of Titanium Dioxide As An Air Pollutant Removing Photocatalyst | 68 | 12 | 56 | 17.6% |
9b17c397 | EcoBlock: Grid Impacts, Scaling, and Resilience | 67 | 19 | 48 | 28.4% |
5rw0t7nz | Market Effects and Market Transformation: Their Role in Energy Efficiency Program Design and Evaluation | 66 | 45 | 21 | 68.2% |
5ph7c1kh | Carbon Market Investment Criteria for Biochar projects | 65 | 11 | 54 | 16.9% |
9fq5v6k7 | City of Santa Barbara Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability Study | 65 | 32 | 33 | 49.2% |
7jx9s0zd | Life‐Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Electricity Generation and Storage Technologies and Common Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Agricultural Building Technologies | 64 | 23 | 41 | 35.9% |
3g21p76g | Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Scenarios for California Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment | 63 | 34 | 29 | 54.0% |
19z9r8v8 | Real Time Grid Reliability Management 2005 (including appendices) | 61 | 30 | 31 | 49.2% |
20n3h0g4 | Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program Final Project Report: State Partnership for Energy Efficient Demonstrations 2012-2014 | 61 | 35 | 26 | 57.4% |
8mm3n4xb | Advancing California's microgrid communities through anticipatory energy resilience | 61 | 14 | 47 | 23.0% |
294157mq | Consequences of Climate Change for Native Plants and Conservation | 60 | 16 | 44 | 26.7% |
45w3k7bz | Behavioral Assumptions Underlying California Residential Sector Energy Efficiency Programs | 60 | 16 | 44 | 26.7% |
6c96p3q3 | Climate Change Scenarios for the San Francisco Region | 60 | 35 | 25 | 58.3% |
46f4w12k | Key Challenges for California's Energy Future | 59 | 40 | 19 | 67.8% |
5rg792nq | 2020 Strategic Analysis of Energy Storage Technology | 59 | 24 | 35 | 40.7% |
8cc330xg | Future Climate Scenarios for California: Freezing Isoclines, Novel Climates, and Climatic Resilience of California’s Protected Areas | 59 | 33 | 26 | 55.9% |
6qr3506h | Wind Power Plant Equivalencing | 57 | 27 | 30 | 47.4% |
4c95r182 | Developing and Applying Process-based Models for Estimating GHG and Air Emissions from California Dairies | 56 | 36 | 20 | 64.3% |
77t8f09n | The Future of California Consumer Energy Finance | 56 | 23 | 33 | 41.1% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.