California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
Parent: UC Berkeley
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for August through November, 2024
Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02c6h0sm | WECC Wind Generator Development | 198 | 17 | 181 | 8.6% |
6bx133h8 | Keeping the lights on: the Oakland EcoBlock community electrification and microgrid improves health, comfort and resilience in an urban neighborhood | 170 | 23 | 147 | 13.5% |
35k1861z | Biomethane from Dairy Waste, a Sourcebook for the Production and Use of Renewable Natural Gas | 162 | 41 | 121 | 25.3% |
2nh0h4nb | Persistence of Energy Efficiency Behaviors over Time: Evidence from a Community-Based Program | 155 | 13 | 142 | 8.4% |
1qm749nx | Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the San Francisco Bay Area | 143 | 53 | 90 | 37.1% |
0696v9nb | Social Vulnerability to Climate Change in California | 109 | 28 | 81 | 25.7% |
81x1c1t5 | Challenges to the Integration of Renewable Resources at High System Penetration | 106 | 41 | 65 | 38.7% |
63k9r489 | Behavior-Based Energy Efficiency: A Case Study of the Oakland EcoBlock Final Project Report | 102 | 26 | 76 | 25.5% |
17582969 | Estimating Risk to California Energy Infrastructure from Projected Climate Change | 96 | 32 | 64 | 33.3% |
0jp4w9hq | The Impacts of Sea Level Rise on the San Francisco Bay | 95 | 25 | 70 | 26.3% |
76w3m09c | Development of Fault Current Controller Technology | 94 | 22 | 72 | 23.4% |
1bs0h6pk | Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change in California Agriculture | 90 | 38 | 52 | 42.2% |
9qx629fh | Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerabilities, and Adaptation in the San Francisco Bay Area: A Synthesis of PIER Program Reports and Other Relevant Research | 86 | 27 | 59 | 31.4% |
1s88n8c6 | White Paper: The EcoBlock Project and the “Own Use” Exemption under Public Utilities Code Section 218 – A Way Forward for Privately Operated Microgrids | 80 | 14 | 66 | 17.5% |
9c0618tq | Climate Change: Challenges And Solutions For California Agricultural Landscapes | 78 | 24 | 54 | 30.8% |
2267w31c | Number and propagation of line outages in cascading events in electric power transmission systems | 76 | 1 | 75 | 1.3% |
4z76h1cn | Oscillation Detection and Analysis | 75 | 22 | 53 | 29.3% |
5bk6h3pq | Distribution Monitoring for Renewables Integration | 75 | 10 | 65 | 13.3% |
2zd3m0kr | Cool Colored Cars to Reduce Air-Conditioning Energy Use and reduce CO2 Emission | 72 | 34 | 38 | 47.2% |
49v0n1n2 | Climate Change and Wildfire in and Around California: Fire Modeling and Loss Modeling | 72 | 13 | 59 | 18.1% |
99k3736h | WECC Wind Power Plant Power Flow Modeling Guide | 71 | 19 | 52 | 26.8% |
5wd1797m | Fire and Climate Change in California: Changes in the Distribution and Frequency of Fire in Climates of the Future and Recent Past (1911-2099) | 70 | 20 | 50 | 28.6% |
7kt682n7 | Residential HVAC and Distribution Research Implementation | 70 | 7 | 63 | 10.0% |
09s3h0t6 | Zenergy Power Corporate Fact Sheet | 69 | 25 | 44 | 36.2% |
5rw0t7nz | Market Effects and Market Transformation: Their Role in Energy Efficiency Program Design and Evaluation | 67 | 52 | 15 | 77.6% |
3t2160dp | Adaptation Strategies for Agricultural Sustainability in Yolo County, California | 66 | 30 | 36 | 45.5% |
3vp1c1p8 | Assessment Of Household Carbon Footprint Reduction Potentials | 65 | 34 | 31 | 52.3% |
46f4w12k | Key Challenges for California's Energy Future | 64 | 50 | 14 | 78.1% |
1vc2q811 | Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation in San Francisco Bay: Results from Case Studies | 62 | 23 | 39 | 37.1% |
6c96p3q3 | Climate Change Scenarios for the San Francisco Region | 60 | 32 | 28 | 53.3% |
3jb1n7fk | Evaluation Of Titanium Dioxide As An Air Pollutant Removing Photocatalyst | 59 | 5 | 54 | 8.5% |
9fq5v6k7 | City of Santa Barbara Sea-Level Rise Vulnerability Study | 58 | 26 | 32 | 44.8% |
3q9849pc | Electric Distribution System Simulation and Analysis Tools: Status and Research Gaps for Integration of Renewables and Electric Vehicles | 57 | 10 | 47 | 17.5% |
7w92d9v7 | Building Energy Efficient Communities: A Research Agenda for California | 57 | 32 | 25 | 56.1% |
8vw23703 | Market Structure and Energy Efficiency:The Case of New Commercial Buildings | 57 | 15 | 42 | 26.3% |
5ph7c1kh | Carbon Market Investment Criteria for Biochar projects | 56 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% |
2w9962wn | Mapping Climate Change Exposures, Vulnerabilities, and Adaptation to Public Health Risks in the San Francisco Bay and Fresno Regions | 55 | 17 | 38 | 30.9% |
7ch5r7bj | Utility investment vs. consumer loans: Getting to yes on energy efficiency through inclusive financing for all | 54 | 4 | 50 | 7.4% |
9b17c397 | EcoBlock: Grid Impacts, Scaling, and Resilience | 52 | 14 | 38 | 26.9% |
294157mq | Consequences of Climate Change for Native Plants and Conservation | 51 | 11 | 40 | 21.6% |
45w3k7bz | Behavioral Assumptions Underlying California Residential Sector Energy Efficiency Programs | 51 | 9 | 42 | 17.6% |
7jx9s0zd | Life‐Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Electricity Generation and Storage Technologies and Common Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Agricultural Building Technologies | 51 | 15 | 36 | 29.4% |
6qr3506h | Wind Power Plant Equivalencing | 50 | 21 | 29 | 42.0% |
28r0c56d | Preparing for the Impacts of Climate Change in California: Opportunities and Constraints for Adaptation | 49 | 9 | 40 | 18.4% |
601164zw | An Assessment Of Battery And Hydrogen Energy Storage Systems Integrated With Wind Energy Resources In California | 49 | 11 | 38 | 22.4% |
30m1f02x | Duct Tape Durability Testing | 47 | 7 | 40 | 14.9% |
3g21p76g | Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Scenarios for California Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment | 47 | 23 | 24 | 48.9% |
5wv9f40k | Impacts of Predicted Sea-Level Rise and Extreme Storm Events on the Transportation Infrastructure in the San Francisco Bay Region | 47 | 21 | 26 | 44.7% |
8mm3n4xb | Advancing California's microgrid communities through anticipatory energy resilience | 47 | 12 | 35 | 25.5% |
5rg792nq | 2020 Strategic Analysis of Energy Storage Technology | 46 | 19 | 27 | 41.3% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.