Carbon Sequestration
Parent: California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
eScholarship stats: History by Item for April through July, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | 2026-07 | 2026-06 | 2026-05 | 2026-04 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3tp538q9 | Assessment of the Barriers and Value of Applying CO2 Sequestration in California | 639 | 121 | 210 | 198 | 110 |
| 1tn8n7gq | Reforestation as a Forest Carbon Project: An Outreach Toolkit for Conservation Organizations and Landowners | 219 | 21 | 64 | 79 | 55 |
| 57g7w24m | Opportunity assessment for establishing hybrid poplars in California, Oregon and Washington, and Summary of the carbon storage potential for fast growing species (hybrid poplar) in Oregon | 177 | 17 | 59 | 61 | 40 |
| 585485h9 | Potential for induced seismicity related to the Northern California CO2 reduction projection pilot test, Solano County, California. | 160 | 26 | 41 | 59 | 34 |
| 0hz7301s | An analysis of wildfire fuel treatments as a carbon offset project type | 159 | 10 | 34 | 75 | 40 |
| 8c00350j | A Contribution to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB), Phase II | 159 | 24 | 36 | 69 | 30 |
| 4kp9x04j | Research Roadmap of Technologies for Carbon Sequestration Alternatives | 133 | 12 | 30 | 50 | 41 |
| 5qx7m29p | Assessment of the Potential for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Reactions with Mafic Rocks and by Enhanced Oil Recovery in Nevada | 131 | 24 | 26 | 44 | 37 |
| 5755n5tq | WESTCARB afforestation pilot projects in Shasta County, California | 129 | 11 | 20 | 58 | 40 |
| 9258g443 | Findings and Recommendations by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 128 | 10 | 32 | 44 | 42 |
| 1268m1mp | Summary of the rangelands suitable for terrestrial carbon sequestration in Shasta County | 124 | 8 | 25 | 57 | 34 |
| 13g526j2 | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in California | 124 | 8 | 31 | 45 | 40 |
| 17q6q5jp | Characterization of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with conversion of forest to residential Development the Puget Sound, Washington. | 121 | 6 | 18 | 55 | 42 |
| 5gv9c890 | Carbon Utilization to Meet California’s Climate Change Goals | 121 | 11 | 33 | 45 | 32 |
| 1hp9f7tg | Alaska geologic CO2 storage: Scoping evaluation of deep coal seam and saline aquifer storage potential | 118 | 5 | 25 | 58 | 30 |
| 2qt5x4js | Physical Modeling Of CO2 Sequestration | 115 | 11 | 13 | 51 | 40 |
| 3z3908w5 | Background Reports for the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 111 | 10 | 23 | 43 | 35 |
| 9xg9n2pj | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Lake County, Oregon | 110 | 6 | 17 | 45 | 42 |
| 5ph7c1kh | Carbon Market Investment Criteria for Biochar projects | 105 | 5 | 25 | 41 | 34 |
| 1056426n | Centralia (Washington) geologic formation CO2 storage assessment | 103 | 13 | 19 | 41 | 30 |
| 3rq2g4sg | California's Policy Approach to Develop Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration as a Mitigation Technology | 102 | 7 | 21 | 41 | 33 |
| 07z0c8c8 | Environmental non-governmental organizations’ perceptions of geologic sequestration | 101 | 4 | 15 | 51 | 31 |
| 63c8g8vk | Storage estimates – Washington and Oregon onshore and offshore sedimentary basins | 99 | 8 | 28 | 37 | 26 |
| 0cd4g4s8 | The role of social factors in shaping public perception of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US | 98 | 7 | 17 | 49 | 25 |
| 35r8w5qf | West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) Down-Select Report for Task 7: The King Island Characterization Well at King Island, San Joaquin County, California. | 95 | 7 | 14 | 47 | 27 |
| 4t191183 | Supplemental View of the California CCS Review Panel Recommendations | 94 | 8 | 16 | 35 | 35 |
| 5hc547gk | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in Arizona | 94 | 1 | 20 | 42 | 31 |
| 39c3883f | Emissions and potential emission reductions from hazardous fuel treatments in the WESTCARB region (including 4 appendices) | 88 | 2 | 19 | 34 | 33 |
| 1qq3m68d | Certification framework: leakage risk assessment for CO2 injection at the Montezuma Hills site, Solano County, California. | 82 | 11 | 10 | 28 | 33 |
| 2t61h2qq | Demonstration of the Climate Action Reserve Forestry protocols at the LaTour Demonstration State Forest | 81 | 5 | 13 | 37 | 26 |
| 30z1r87m | Regional characterization for the Arizona: potential of riparian areas for carbon sequestration | 81 | 6 | 17 | 33 | 25 |
| 7mn6x3x4 | CO2 resource assessment – oil and gas fields of California | 79 | 1 | 14 | 42 | 22 |
| 37r1w6x3 | Anticipatory Regulation: Lessons from fracking and insights for Greenhouse Gas Removal innovation and governance | 76 | 4 | 30 | 23 | 19 |
| 4240468x | Community perceptions of carbon sequestration – insights from California | 76 | 6 | 14 | 35 | 21 |
| 1np0n59w | Project Idea Note: afforestation/restoration of riparian areas along Santa Cruz River, Arizona USA | 75 | 3 | 13 | 32 | 27 |
| 7890t6d3 | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Shasta County, California | 74 | 1 | 11 | 33 | 29 |
| 9s01r425 | Seismicity characterization and monitoring at WESTCARB’s proposed Montezuma Hills geologic sequestration site. | 74 | 5 | 19 | 34 | 16 |
| 3g35k5gf | Demonstration of conservation-based forest management to sequester carbon on the Bascom Pacific Forest | 59 | 6 | 6 | 28 | 19 |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.