Civil & Environmental Engineering
Parent: College of Engineering
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for June through September, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74986309 | Numerical modeling of soil liquefaction and lateral spreading using the SANISAND-Sf model in the LEAP experiments | 344 | 293 | 51 | 85.2% |
| 0227z2t1 | SANISAND-MSf: a sand plasticity model with memory surface and semifluidised state | 253 | 134 | 119 | 53.0% |
| 1r37v116 | Roles of pre- and post-liquefaction stages in dynamic system response of liquefiable sand retained by a sheet-pile wall | 246 | 200 | 46 | 81.3% |
| 830502mm | Use of Photron Cameras and TEMA Software to Measure 3D Displacements in Centrifuge Tests | 230 | 91 | 139 | 39.6% |
| 24g1m0w0 | Modeling of Dry and Saturated Soil-Foundation Interfaces | 206 | 94 | 112 | 45.6% |
| 5zc626pj | SKS03: Centrifuge Test of Liquefaction-Induced Downdrag in Interbedded Soil Deposits | 193 | 134 | 59 | 69.4% |
| 6h49q8ng | Multidirectional cyclic shearing of clays and sands: Evaluation of two bounding surface plasticity models | 157 | 98 | 59 | 62.4% |
| 8c8737bb | Proceedings of the Symposium on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Centrifuge Modeling | 156 | 128 | 28 | 82.1% |
| 33k7b297 | SKS02: Centrifuge Test of Liquefaction-Induced Downdrag in Uniform Liquefiable Deposit | 138 | 70 | 68 | 50.7% |
| 1m7328wc | Modeling cyclic shearing of sands in the semifluidized state | 117 | 61 | 56 | 52.1% |
| 3803023v | Centrifuge Study of Downdrag on Axially Loaded Piles in Liquefiable Soils | 117 | 33 | 84 | 28.2% |
| 2p4529hr | Strategies for numerical simulation of cast-in-place piles under axial loading | 114 | 77 | 37 | 67.5% |
| 0xj8f0s6 | Effect of particle shape on cyclic liquefaction resistance of granular materials | 110 | 69 | 41 | 62.7% |
| 5rv3d8np | Effect of Anisotropic Consolidation on Cyclic Liquefaction Resistance of Granular Materials via 3D-DEM Modeling | 109 | 61 | 48 | 56.0% |
| 042876p3 | Effect of coefficient of uniformity on cyclic liquefaction resistance of granular materials | 106 | 38 | 68 | 35.8% |
| 2c13z7p1 | Quantifying the Current and Future Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Road Infrastructure in Africa | 105 | 22 | 83 | 21.0% |
| 1vh8z8hp | Characteristic limitations of advanced plasticity and hypoplasticity models for cyclic loading of sands | 103 | 54 | 49 | 52.4% |
| 98d576pk | Liquefaction of granular materials in constant-volume cyclic shearing: Transition between solid-like and fluid-like states | 99 | 47 | 52 | 47.5% |
| 1gd5r143 | NGC FACILITY AND TRENDS IN COST OF CENTRIFUGES | 87 | 22 | 65 | 25.3% |
| 9qt2m9zz | An investigation of the bearing capacity of footings under eccentric and inclined loading on sand in a geotechnical centrifuge | 87 | 20 | 67 | 23.0% |
| 93r6q61n | The simplified thermal modeling approach used in CalME | 83 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% |
| 1fd8r504 | Using Cameras for Measuring Displacements in Model Tests | 82 | 32 | 50 | 39.0% |
| 0385q85p | Centrifuge modelling of artificial sand islands in earthquakes | 76 | 22 | 54 | 28.9% |
| 0kj021g7 | Effects of size polydispersity on random close-packed configurations of spherical particles | 76 | 33 | 43 | 43.4% |
| 8860f09v | FACTORS IN THE DESIGN OF A ROCK MECHANICS CENTRIFUGE FOR STRONG ROCK | 72 | 18 | 54 | 25.0% |
| 9xn632p3 | Evolution of granular media under constant-volume multidirectional cyclic shearing | 72 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% |
| 9mm29952 | Impact of bidirectional seismic shearing on the volumetric response of sand deposits | 70 | 31 | 39 | 44.3% |
| 06b3p6g4 | Parametric Study of Liquefaction Induced Downdrag on Axially Loaded Piles | 68 | 26 | 42 | 38.2% |
| 4k24x5vb | AMERICAN LITERATUREON GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGE MODELING 1931 - 1984 | 66 | 33 | 33 | 50.0% |
| 9qv8z3gr | Evolution of granular materials under isochoric cyclic simple shearing | 65 | 23 | 42 | 35.4% |
| 3tc4m6hq | Impact of bidirectional seismic shearing on the volumetric response of sand deposits | 64 | 31 | 33 | 48.4% |
| 510213fk | CRATERING MODEL VERIFICATION: A CENTRIFUGE PREDICTION VERSUS FIELD RESULT FOR A 40-TON EXPLOSIVE EVENT [abstract] | 63 | 12 | 51 | 19.0% |
| 73x3m488 | Experiments involving liquifailure and the influence of boundaries [abstract] | 62 | 5 | 57 | 8.1% |
| 8k4584r0 | Tests on piles installed in flight on the centrifuge | 59 | 12 | 47 | 20.3% |
| 8m14w12z | BEHAVIOR OF A TUNNEL DURING A RAPID EARTHQUAKE FAULTING EPISODE | 59 | 20 | 39 | 33.9% |
| 8dr0v9j8 | ANALYTICAL AND CENTRIFUGE STUDIES LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILES | 54 | 25 | 29 | 46.3% |
| 0p96v327 | DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF FOUNDATIONS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN A CENTRIFUGE | 53 | 22 | 31 | 41.5% |
| 4wc4m8wk | PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF SUBSIDENCE IN FRACTURED SHALE STRATA [abstract] | 51 | 15 | 36 | 29.4% |
| 005621vv | Reply to the discussion by Dimitrios Kolymbas of the article entitled âCharacteristic limitations of advanced plasticity and hypoplasticity models for cyclic loading of sandsâ | 50 | 10 | 40 | 20.0% |
| 46d948xn | The centrifuge as an aid to the designer | 50 | 11 | 39 | 22.0% |
| 73k7s64v | The L.C.P.C. Centrifuge | 49 | 12 | 37 | 24.5% |
| 43z1272w | A Centrifuge Modeling Procedure for Landfill Cover Subsidence | 46 | 20 | 26 | 43.5% |
| 4144w6wb | DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BOCHUM GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGE AND POSSIBLE FIELDS OF RESEARCH | 45 | 23 | 22 | 51.1% |
| 3t63g4h0 | EVALUATION OF A CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR SOFT CLAY USING THE CENTRIFUGE | 44 | 11 | 33 | 25.0% |
| 778858pv | Unexpected Scaling Effects in Flow Through Centrifugal Models of Permeable Soils [abstract] | 44 | 10 | 34 | 22.7% |
| 8sm1n7kz | CENTRIFUGAL MODEL TESTS FOR ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF FOOTINGS ON STEEP SLOPES IN COHESIONLESS SOIL [abstract] | 43 | 18 | 25 | 41.9% |
| 0hc042kf | CENTRIFUGE PREDICTION OF EGRESS SYSTEM PERFORMANCE | 42 | 12 | 30 | 28.6% |
| 73x8g9zw | Fulfilment of boundary conditions for seismic simulation | 42 | 9 | 33 | 21.4% |
| 8953g9n6 | Centrifugal Modeling of Subsidence of Landfill Covers [abstract] | 40 | 5 | 35 | 12.5% |
| 1vx67612 | RELATIONSHIPS FOR MODELLING WATER FLOW IN GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGE MODELS [abstract] | 39 | 9 | 30 | 23.1% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.