Archive for Mathematical Anthropology and Cultural Theory
Parent: Human Complex Systems
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for January through April, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6xm8s89k | KINSHIP, MARRIAGE AND AGE IN ABORIGINAL AUSTRALIA | 148 | 12 | 136 | 8.1% |
| 7d69w4sk | Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Aboriginal Kinship | 110 | 58 | 52 | 52.7% |
| 1hs7w49v | Anthropology, Mathematics, Kinship: A Tribute to the Anthropologist Per Hage and His Work with the Mathematician Frank Harary | 87 | 47 | 40 | 54.0% |
| 3g59f8zc | FORMAL ANALYSIS OF KINSHIP TERMINOLOGIES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO WHAT CONSTITUTES KINSHIP (COMPLETE TEXT) | 53 | 7 | 46 | 13.2% |
| 5m51s6k6 | FAMILIAL GENERATIONS TUTORIAL | 50 | 20 | 30 | 40.0% |
| 7p343150 | SOCIALITY IN E. O. WILSON’S GENESIS: EXPANDING THE PAST, IMAGINING THE FUTURE | 46 | 8 | 38 | 17.4% |
| 3xs3c8zg | EGOCENTRIC AND SOCIOCENTRIC STRUCTURE IN CLASSIFICATORY KINSHIP SYSTEMS: FOUR THEOREMS | 44 | 7 | 37 | 15.9% |
| 5cp5z12s | Tongan Kinship Terminology: Insights from an Algebraic Analysis | 43 | 30 | 13 | 69.8% |
| 67g000jk | Residential Group Composition Among the Alyawarra | 42 | 8 | 34 | 19.0% |
| 6tt297m0 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH USING THE AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL ALYAWARRA KINSHIP DATASET: PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY 2004-2020 | 39 | 10 | 29 | 25.6% |
| 7c16s5qd | THE GENERATIVE LOGIC OF CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES: THE THONGA-RONGA KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY AS A CASE STUDY | 39 | 3 | 36 | 7.7% |
| 67x4t8ts | Collective Violence in Darfur: An Agent-based Model of Pastoral Nomad/Sedentary Peasant Interaction | 36 | 15 | 21 | 41.7% |
| 3h24m1wt | ALLOMATERNAL CARE AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF NATURALISTIC OBSERVATIONS AMONG CONTEMPORARY FORAGERS: A COMMENTARY ON DENHAM’S “ALYAWARRA KINSHIP, INFANT CARRYING, AND ALLOPARENTING” | 31 | 13 | 18 | 41.9% |
| 640994nk | ALYAWARRA KINSHIP, INFANT CARRYING, AND ALLOPARENTING | 31 | 6 | 25 | 19.4% |
| 7gb031cf | THE INFLUENCE OF ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL ON PROXIMATE MECHANISMS OF NATURAL SELECTION | 31 | 3 | 28 | 9.7% |
| 11w3x4qw | Aboriginal Men Coming of Age in Central Australia | 30 | 3 | 27 | 10.0% |
| 09k717j6 | THE READ-LEHMAN LETTERS ON KINSHIP MATHEMATICS | 29 | 3 | 26 | 10.3% |
| 4j39f77c | TOWARD A THEORY OF CULTURE AND ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL | 29 | 5 | 24 | 17.2% |
| 7963216r | RELATIVES, MOLECULES AND PARTICLES | 29 | 5 | 24 | 17.2% |
| 7dc0m5jj | THE GENERATIVE LOGIC OF DRAVIDIAN LANGUAGE TERMINOLOGIES | 29 | 3 | 26 | 10.3% |
| 05c6f2p5 | Perceiving Ethnic Differences: Consensus Analysis and Personhood in Welsh-American Populations | 28 | 5 | 23 | 17.9% |
| 66h059r2 | PATRICK MCCONVELL’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 27 | 4 | 23 | 14.8% |
| 0h71p0c4 | Evidence for Systemic Outbreeding: A Rejoinder to Denham, 'Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Aboriginal Kinship' | 21 | 5 | 16 | 23.8% |
| 2777f1xg | ALMEIDA’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 21 | 3 | 18 | 14.3% |
| 7gx8n6v9 | READ’S REPLY TO COMMENTS ONTHE GENERATIVE LOGIC OF CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES: THE THONGA-RONGA KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY AS A CASE STUDY | 21 | 2 | 19 | 9.5% |
| 8qp9g5vh | Reflections on the Algebraic Representation of Kinship Structure | 21 | 14 | 7 | 66.7% |
| 9s12d4c8 | INFORMATION FLOWS IN KINSHIP NETWORKS | 21 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% |
| 3wx134vt | THE PHYSICAL FARM BUDGET: AN INDIGENOUS OPTIMIZING MANAGERIAL ALGORITHM | 20 | 5 | 15 | 25.0% |
| 66m2b6sf | PRESCRIPTIVE KINSHIP SYSTEMS, PERMUTATIONS, GROUPS AND GRAPHS | 20 | 4 | 16 | 20.0% |
| 8qp241nc | COMMENT ON “ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS” BY MAURO WILLIAM BARBOSA DE ALMEIDA | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% |
| 9t64g4cm | ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS | 20 | 6 | 14 | 30.0% |
| 394512jm | COMMENT ON BARBOSA DE ALMEIDA “ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS” | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% |
| 1h142307 | HEADY’S COMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 18 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% |
| 32q9153k | HAMBERGER’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 17 | 2 | 15 | 11.8% |
| 4w18c8zt | TJON SIE FAT’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% |
| 9x78t1wm | COMMENT ON VAZ’ RELATIVES, MOLECULES AND PARTICLES | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% |
| 24q537d6 | Comment on Denham's 'Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Kinship' | 16 | 7 | 9 | 43.8% |
| 2ts445n8 | ANSWER TO COMMENTS BY DOUGLAS WHITE, DWIGHT READ AND F. K. LEHMAN | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% |
| 328293gn | TRAUTMANN AND WHITELEY’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% |
| 9cs6m00w | A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO THE COGNITION OF SPACE AND ITS LINGUISTIC EXPRESSIONS | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% |
| 0kc7r58s | RESTATEMENT OF THE THEORY OF CULTURAL RULES | 15 | 5 | 10 | 33.3% |
| 2hr071tr | NOTES TOWARD A MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF CULTURE | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% |
| 8cp3p35j | COMMENT ON VAZ’ RELATIVES, MOLECULES AND PARTICLES | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% |
| 7cr531r5 | LETTER CONCERNING “ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS” BY MAURO WILLIAM BARBOSA DE ALMEIDA In MACT Volume 3 No. 1, August 2010 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 42.9% |
| 2jb160n3 | Comment on Denham's 'Beyond Fictions of Closure of Australian Aboriginal Kinship' | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% |
| 3z396316 | CROSS - COMMENT ON “ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS” BY MAURO WILLIAM BARBOSA DE ALMEIDA | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% |
| 6kh181t1 | Experimenting with 'Lad Culture': A Simulation Based on Willis' "Learning to Labor" | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% |
| 3r25h05m | RESPONSE TO MACT COMMENTS ON DENHAM’S “ALYAWARRA KINSHIP, INFANT CARRYING, AND ALLOPARENTING” | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% |
| 6h7362st | Response to Comments on "Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Aboriginal Kinship" | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% |
| 4m43v3x6 | Response to Read's Comment on "Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Aboriginal Kinship" | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.