Archive for Mathematical Anthropology and Cultural Theory
Parent: Human Complex Systems
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for April through July, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7d69w4sk | Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Aboriginal Kinship | 216 | 165 | 51 | 76.4% |
| 6xm8s89k | KINSHIP, MARRIAGE AND AGE IN ABORIGINAL AUSTRALIA | 121 | 15 | 106 | 12.4% |
| 1hs7w49v | Anthropology, Mathematics, Kinship: A Tribute to the Anthropologist Per Hage and His Work with the Mathematician Frank Harary | 119 | 90 | 29 | 75.6% |
| 5cp5z12s | Tongan Kinship Terminology: Insights from an Algebraic Analysis | 63 | 51 | 12 | 81.0% |
| 5m51s6k6 | FAMILIAL GENERATIONS TUTORIAL | 54 | 31 | 23 | 57.4% |
| 6tt297m0 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH USING THE AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL ALYAWARRA KINSHIP DATASET: PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY 2004-2020 | 46 | 15 | 31 | 32.6% |
| 11w3x4qw | Aboriginal Men Coming of Age in Central Australia | 42 | 15 | 27 | 35.7% |
| 3g59f8zc | FORMAL ANALYSIS OF KINSHIP TERMINOLOGIES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO WHAT CONSTITUTES KINSHIP (COMPLETE TEXT) | 36 | 5 | 31 | 13.9% |
| 67g000jk | Residential Group Composition Among the Alyawarra | 32 | 8 | 24 | 25.0% |
| 7p343150 | SOCIALITY IN E. O. WILSON’S GENESIS: EXPANDING THE PAST, IMAGINING THE FUTURE | 32 | 9 | 23 | 28.1% |
| 7963216r | RELATIVES, MOLECULES AND PARTICLES | 31 | 11 | 20 | 35.5% |
| 6kh181t1 | Experimenting with 'Lad Culture': A Simulation Based on Willis' "Learning to Labor" | 30 | 14 | 16 | 46.7% |
| 640994nk | ALYAWARRA KINSHIP, INFANT CARRYING, AND ALLOPARENTING | 27 | 3 | 24 | 11.1% |
| 4j39f77c | TOWARD A THEORY OF CULTURE AND ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL | 26 | 12 | 14 | 46.2% |
| 7dc0m5jj | THE GENERATIVE LOGIC OF DRAVIDIAN LANGUAGE TERMINOLOGIES | 26 | 14 | 12 | 53.8% |
| 8qp9g5vh | Reflections on the Algebraic Representation of Kinship Structure | 26 | 13 | 13 | 50.0% |
| 7c16s5qd | THE GENERATIVE LOGIC OF CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES: THE THONGA-RONGA KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY AS A CASE STUDY | 25 | 12 | 13 | 48.0% |
| 05c6f2p5 | Perceiving Ethnic Differences: Consensus Analysis and Personhood in Welsh-American Populations | 24 | 2 | 22 | 8.3% |
| 3wx134vt | THE PHYSICAL FARM BUDGET: AN INDIGENOUS OPTIMIZING MANAGERIAL ALGORITHM | 24 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 3xs3c8zg | EGOCENTRIC AND SOCIOCENTRIC STRUCTURE IN CLASSIFICATORY KINSHIP SYSTEMS: FOUR THEOREMS | 24 | 8 | 16 | 33.3% |
| 67x4t8ts | Collective Violence in Darfur: An Agent-based Model of Pastoral Nomad/Sedentary Peasant Interaction | 23 | 5 | 18 | 21.7% |
| 09k717j6 | THE READ-LEHMAN LETTERS ON KINSHIP MATHEMATICS | 22 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% |
| 0h71p0c4 | Evidence for Systemic Outbreeding: A Rejoinder to Denham, 'Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Aboriginal Kinship' | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% |
| 32q9153k | HAMBERGER’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 22 | 9 | 13 | 40.9% |
| 9s12d4c8 | INFORMATION FLOWS IN KINSHIP NETWORKS | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% |
| 0kc7r58s | RESTATEMENT OF THE THEORY OF CULTURAL RULES | 18 | 10 | 8 | 55.6% |
| 3h24m1wt | ALLOMATERNAL CARE AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF NATURALISTIC OBSERVATIONS AMONG CONTEMPORARY FORAGERS: A COMMENTARY ON DENHAM’S “ALYAWARRA KINSHIP, INFANT CARRYING, AND ALLOPARENTING” | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% |
| 9t64g4cm | ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% |
| 1h142307 | HEADY’S COMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% |
| 9cs6m00w | A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO THE COGNITION OF SPACE AND ITS LINGUISTIC EXPRESSIONS | 16 | 5 | 11 | 31.3% |
| 24q537d6 | Comment on Denham's 'Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Kinship' | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% |
| 2hr071tr | NOTES TOWARD A MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF CULTURE | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% |
| 9x78t1wm | COMMENT ON VAZ’ RELATIVES, MOLECULES AND PARTICLES | 15 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% |
| 4w18c8zt | TJON SIE FAT’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 14 | 4 | 10 | 28.6% |
| 7gx8n6v9 | READ’S REPLY TO COMMENTS ONTHE GENERATIVE LOGIC OF CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES: THE THONGA-RONGA KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY AS A CASE STUDY | 14 | 4 | 10 | 28.6% |
| 8cp3p35j | COMMENT ON VAZ’ RELATIVES, MOLECULES AND PARTICLES | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% |
| 2777f1xg | ALMEIDA’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 13 | 4 | 9 | 30.8% |
| 2ts445n8 | ANSWER TO COMMENTS BY DOUGLAS WHITE, DWIGHT READ AND F. K. LEHMAN | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% |
| 328293gn | TRAUTMANN AND WHITELEY’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% |
| 394512jm | COMMENT ON BARBOSA DE ALMEIDA “ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS” | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% |
| 66h059r2 | PATRICK MCCONVELL’sCOMMENT ON D. READ “GENERATIVE CROW-OMAHA TERMINOLOGIES” | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% |
| 2jb160n3 | Comment on Denham's 'Beyond Fictions of Closure of Australian Aboriginal Kinship' | 12 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% |
| 3r25h05m | RESPONSE TO MACT COMMENTS ON DENHAM’S “ALYAWARRA KINSHIP, INFANT CARRYING, AND ALLOPARENTING” | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% |
| 3z396316 | CROSS - COMMENT ON “ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS” BY MAURO WILLIAM BARBOSA DE ALMEIDA | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% |
| 7gb031cf | THE INFLUENCE OF ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL ON PROXIMATE MECHANISMS OF NATURAL SELECTION | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% |
| 8965p47c | Comment on Denham's 'Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Aboriginal Kinship' | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% |
| 89j302k1 | COMMENT ON VAZ’ RELATIVES, MOLECULES AND PARTICLES | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% |
| 26x930vn | NEW RESULTS: THE LOGIC OF OLDER/YOUNGER SIBLING TERMS IN CLASSIFICATORY TERMINOLOGIES | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% |
| 8qp241nc | COMMENT ON “ON THE STRUCTURE OF DRAVIDIAN RELATIONSHIP SYSTEMS” BY MAURO WILLIAM BARBOSA DE ALMEIDA | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% |
| 824791d1 | Comment on Denham's 'Beyond Fictions of Closure in Australian Aboriginal Kinship' | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.