Institute of the Environment and Sustainability
Parent: UCLA
eScholarship stats: History by Item for May through August, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | 2024-08 | 2024-07 | 2024-06 | 2024-05 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0d50g6w4 | Corporate Environmental Performance and Lobbying | 137 | 53 | 20 | 26 | 38 |
| 3k89n5b7 | IS THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG? AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE CARBON FOOTPRINTS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE | 111 | 29 | 20 | 33 | 29 |
| 6qk9v6xf | Eco-Premium or Eco-Penalty? Eco-labels and quality in the organic wine market | 95 | 29 | 31 | 17 | 18 |
| 25975163 | Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975-2012 | 65 | 11 | 27 | 11 | 16 |
| 1bq8f0tp | THE DYNAMICS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE:EVIDENCE FROM ENERGY CONSERVATION | 62 | 30 | 20 | 7 | 5 |
| 1qg9f2q6 | WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HIGH FREQUENCY APPLIANCE LEVEL ENERGY METERING? RESULTS FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT | 58 | 25 | 24 | 6 | 3 |
| 0gw211sc | Production Frontier Methodologies and Efficiency as a Performance Measure in Strategic Management Research | 56 | 8 | 22 | 13 | 13 |
| 5t40p9ht | Greenhouse gas performance standards: From each according to his emission intensity or from each according to his emissions? | 47 | 25 | 17 | 4 | 1 |
| 2rn3b77k | Organizational Configurations for Sustainability and Employee Productivity: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach | 42 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 4 |
| 1tn6s1w3 | The relationship between policy choice and the size of the policy region: Why small jurisdictions may prefer renewable energy policies to reduce CO2 emissions | 40 | 22 | 15 | 2 | 1 |
| 3zx2j5br | Best Practices for Southern California Coastal Wetland Restoration and Management in the Face of Climate Change | 40 | 9 | 17 | 5 | 9 |
| 6v88k76b | Mid-Century Warming in the Los Angeles Region - Part I of the “Climate Change in the Los Angeles Region” projec | 39 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 10 |
| 0sn9f7z0 | Using Market Forces for Social Good | 38 | 9 | 14 | 7 | 8 |
| 3r22v65j | Measuring Eco-inefficiency: A New Frontier Approach | 37 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 7 |
| 7d16s49d | Saving Power to Conserve Your Reputation? | 35 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 1 |
| 0018v62d | Top Management Involvement in the Adoption of Energy Efficiency Projects | 34 | 8 | 14 | 10 | 2 |
| 39k9h976 | On environmental lifecycle assessment for policy selection | 34 | 14 | 15 | 3 | 2 |
| 05v5d5tr | Sustainability and Market Conditions:The Resource Efficiency paradox | 32 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 1 |
| 1hh5m933 | Agricultural expansion induced by biofuels: Comparing predictions of market‐equilibrium models to historical trends | 32 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 2 |
| 0xt9v9wg | Information Strategies for Energy Conservation: A Field Experiment in India, 2017 | 31 | 5 | 13 | 8 | 5 |
| 09n589qr | Multi-objective fuel policies: Renewable fuel standards versus Fuel greenhouse gas intensity standards | 30 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 2 |
| 5fg7d7th | Does Organic Wine Taste Better? An Analysis of Experts' Ratings | 30 | 7 | 13 | 3 | 7 |
| 28x2b0gn | Field Experiments in Corporate Sustainability Research: Testing Strategies for Behavior Change in Markets and Organizations | 28 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
| 816165nk | Multi-criteria comparison of fuel policies: Renewable fuel mandate, fuel emission-standards, and fuel carbon tax | 27 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 2 |
| 7mq9j9bz | Lifecycle emission impacts of subsidies for energy efficiency: Evidence from Cash‐for‐Clunkers | 26 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 4rn8903p | Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975-2011 | 22 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 2 |
| 32c395hn | Regulation of GHG emissions from transportation fuels: Emission quota versus emission intensity standard | 16 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 1 |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.