Recent Work
Parent: Institute of the Environment and Sustainability
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for January through April, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3k89n5b7 | IS THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG? AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE CARBON FOOTPRINTS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE | 119 | 25 | 94 | 21.0% |
| 0d50g6w4 | Corporate Environmental Performance and Lobbying | 111 | 17 | 94 | 15.3% |
| 6qk9v6xf | Eco-Premium or Eco-Penalty? Eco-labels and quality in the organic wine market | 94 | 40 | 54 | 42.6% |
| 2rn3b77k | Organizational Configurations for Sustainability and Employee Productivity: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach | 73 | 48 | 25 | 65.8% |
| 25975163 | Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975-2012 | 67 | 34 | 33 | 50.7% |
| 6v88k76b | Mid-Century Warming in the Los Angeles Region - Part I of the “Climate Change in the Los Angeles Region” projec | 47 | 7 | 40 | 14.9% |
| 1bq8f0tp | THE DYNAMICS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE:EVIDENCE FROM ENERGY CONSERVATION | 45 | 11 | 34 | 24.4% |
| 0sn9f7z0 | Using Market Forces for Social Good | 42 | 1 | 41 | 2.4% |
| 0xt9v9wg | Information Strategies for Energy Conservation: A Field Experiment in India, 2017 | 42 | 10 | 32 | 23.8% |
| 3r22v65j | Measuring Eco-inefficiency: A New Frontier Approach | 40 | 27 | 13 | 67.5% |
| 0gw211sc | Production Frontier Methodologies and Efficiency as a Performance Measure in Strategic Management Research | 37 | 16 | 21 | 43.2% |
| 28x2b0gn | Field Experiments in Corporate Sustainability Research: Testing Strategies for Behavior Change in Markets and Organizations | 36 | 3 | 33 | 8.3% |
| 05v5d5tr | Sustainability and Market Conditions:The Resource Efficiency paradox | 32 | 10 | 22 | 31.3% |
| 5t40p9ht | Greenhouse gas performance standards: From each according to his emission intensity or from each according to his emissions? | 32 | 4 | 28 | 12.5% |
| 39k9h976 | On environmental lifecycle assessment for policy selection | 31 | 7 | 24 | 22.6% |
| 0018v62d | Top Management Involvement in the Adoption of Energy Efficiency Projects | 28 | 7 | 21 | 25.0% |
| 09n589qr | Multi-objective fuel policies: Renewable fuel standards versus Fuel greenhouse gas intensity standards | 28 | 2 | 26 | 7.1% |
| 3zx2j5br | Best Practices for Southern California Coastal Wetland Restoration and Management in the Face of Climate Change | 28 | 12 | 16 | 42.9% |
| 5fg7d7th | Does Organic Wine Taste Better? An Analysis of Experts' Ratings | 28 | 4 | 24 | 14.3% |
| 7mq9j9bz | Lifecycle emission impacts of subsidies for energy efficiency: Evidence from Cash‐for‐Clunkers | 28 | 4 | 24 | 14.3% |
| 1qg9f2q6 | WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HIGH FREQUENCY APPLIANCE LEVEL ENERGY METERING? RESULTS FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT | 27 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% |
| 7d16s49d | Saving Power to Conserve Your Reputation? | 27 | 4 | 23 | 14.8% |
| 1hh5m933 | Agricultural expansion induced by biofuels: Comparing predictions of market‐equilibrium models to historical trends | 24 | 2 | 22 | 8.3% |
| 32c395hn | Regulation of GHG emissions from transportation fuels: Emission quota versus emission intensity standard | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% |
| 4rn8903p | Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975-2011 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% |
| 1tn6s1w3 | The relationship between policy choice and the size of the policy region: Why small jurisdictions may prefer renewable energy policies to reduce CO2 emissions | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% |
| 816165nk | Multi-criteria comparison of fuel policies: Renewable fuel mandate, fuel emission-standards, and fuel carbon tax | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.