Skip to main content
Ultrasound-guided central venous access: which probe is preferred for viewing the subclavian vein using a supraclavicular approach?
- Author(s): Lahham, Shadi;
- Wilson, Sean P;
- Subeh, Mohammad;
- Butterfield, Michael;
- Albakri, Abdelhafez R;
- Bashir, Rame;
- Fox, John C
- et al.
Published Web Locationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.013
BackgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound guidance using a linear probe is well established as a tool to increase safety when performing a supradiaphragmatic cannulation of the internal jugular central vein. However, little data exist on which probe is best for performing a supradiaphragmatic cannulation of the subclavian vein.
MethodsThis was a prospective, observational study at a single-site emergency department, where 5 different physician sonologists evaluate individual practice preference for visualization of the subclavian vein using a supraclavicular approach with 2 different linear probes and 1 endocavitary probe.
ResultsOf 155 patients enrolled, there was no clear preference any of the probes (P= .03). After pooling linear probe preference, there was a preference for either linear probe over the alternative endocavitary probe (76.8% vs 23.1%, P< .05).
ConclusionWe observed a preference for a linear probe over an endocavitary probe. Further investigation is necessary to determine which probe is optimal for this application.
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.