- Main
Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects
- Tierney, Warren;
- Schweinsberg, Martin;
- Jordan, Jennifer;
- Kennedy, Deanna M;
- Qureshi, Israr;
- Sommer, S Amy;
- Thornley, Nico;
- Madan, Nikhil;
- Vianello, Michelangelo;
- Awtrey, Eli;
- Zhu, Luke Lei;
- Diermeier, Daniel;
- Heinze, Justin E;
- Srinivasan, Malavika;
- Tannenbaum, David;
- Bivolaru, Eliza;
- Dana, Jason;
- Davis-Stober, Clintin P;
- du Plessis, Christilene;
- Gronau, Quentin F;
- Hafenbrack, Andrew C;
- Liao, Eko Yi;
- Ly, Alexander;
- Marsman, Maarten;
- Murase, Toshio;
- Schaerer, Michael;
- Tworek, Christina M;
- Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan;
- Wong, Lynn;
- Anderson, Tabitha;
- Bauman, Christopher W;
- Bedwell, Wendy L;
- Brescoll, Victoria;
- Canavan, Andrew;
- Chandler, Jesse J;
- Cheries, Erik;
- Cheryan, Sapna;
- Cheung, Felix;
- Cimpian, Andrei;
- Clark, Mark A;
- Cordon, Diana;
- Cushman, Fiery;
- Ditto, Peter H;
- Amell, Alice;
- Frick, Sarah E;
- Gamez-Djokic, Monica;
- Grady, Rebecca Hofstein;
- Graham, Jesse;
- Gu, Jun;
- Hahn, Adam;
- Hanson, Brittany E;
- Hartwich, Nicole J;
- Hein, Kristie;
- Inbar, Yoel;
- Jiang, Lily;
- Kellogg, Tehlyr;
- Legate, Nicole;
- Luoma, Timo P;
- Maibeucher, Heidi;
- Meindl, Peter;
- Miles, Jennifer;
- Mislin, Alexandra;
- Molden, Daniel C;
- Motyl, Matt;
- Newman, George;
- Ngo, Hoai Huong;
- Packham, Harvey;
- Ramsay, P Scott;
- Ray, Jennifer L;
- Sackett, Aaron M;
- Sellier, Anne-Laure;
- Sokolova, Tatiana;
- Sowden, Walter;
- Storage, Daniel;
- Sun, Xiaomin;
- Van Bavel, Jay J;
- Washburn, Anthony N;
- Wei, Cong;
- Wetter, Erik;
- Wilson, Carlos T;
- Darroux, Sophie-Charlotte;
- Uhlmann, Eric Luis
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.82Abstract
We present the data from a crowdsourced project seeking to replicate findings in independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. In this Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) initiative, 25 research groups attempted to replicate 10 moral judgment effects from a single laboratory's research pipeline of unpublished findings. The 10 effects were investigated using online/lab surveys containing psychological manipulations (vignettes) followed by questionnaires. Results revealed a mix of reliable, unreliable, and culturally moderated findings. Unlike any previous replication project, this dataset includes the data from not only the replications but also from the original studies, creating a unique corpus that researchers can use to better understand reproducibility and irreproducibility in science.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-