FRACKING AND FEDERALISM: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH TO RECONCILING NATIONAL AND SUBNATIONAL INTERESTS IN THE UNITED STATES AND SPAIN
- Author(s): Lin, Albert
- et al.
Hydraulic fracturing presents challenges for oversight because its various effects occur at different scales and implicate distinct policy concerns. The uneven distribution of fracturing’s benefits and burdens, moreover, means that national and subnational views regarding fracturing’s desirability are likely to diverge. This Article examines the tensions between national and subnational oversight of hydraulic fracturing in the United States, where the technique has been most commonly deployed, and Spain, which is contemplating its use for the first time. Drawing insights from the federalism literature, this Article offers recommendations for accommodating the varied interests at stake in hydraulic fracturing policy within the contrasting governmental systems of these two countries.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.