‘Safety’ Testing of Products for Human Use: Irrefutable necessity or morally indefensible false sense of security?
- Author(s): Buyukmihci, NC
- et al.
This paper discusses the harmful and fatal use of non-human animals in so-called safety testing of products that are destined for human use (the same principles would be applicable to those destined for other animals). It argues and demonstrates that such use is not scientifically valid if the results are applied to human beings. Moreover, not only does this testing result in extreme suffering and death for non-human beings, dependence on this has also caused substantial harm to people. Alternatives to such use are discussed in the context of being more defensible ethically and scientifically.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.