Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

The paradox of relational development is not universal:Abstract reasoning develops differently across cultures

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrate a puzzling decline in relationalreasoning during development. Specifically, 3-year-olds failin a relational match-to-sample (RMTS) task, while youngerchildren (18-30 months) succeed (Walker, Bridgers, &Gopnik, 2016). Hoyos, Shao, and Gentner (2016) propose thatolder children fail because of a bias toward individual objectproperties induced by “avid noun learning.” If this is the case,children learning a language with a stronger emphasis onverbs, like Mandarin Chinese, may show an attenuateddecline in relational reasoning. We first test this possibility byreproducing the causal RMTS task in China, and find thatMandarin-speaking 3-year-olds outperform their English-speaking peers in the U.S. In a second experiment, we showthat Mandarin speakers exhibit a corresponding bias towardrelational solutions while English speakers prefer object-based solutions in an ambiguous context. We discuss possiblemechanisms through which language and culture maypromote (or hinder) the early development of relationalreasoning.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View