UCSF

To computationally optimize the design of an endovascular magnetic filtration device that binds iron oxide nanoparticles and to validate simulations with experimental results of prototype devices in physiologic flow testing. Three-dimensional computational models of different endovascular magnetic filter devices assessed magnetic particle capture. We simulated a series of cylindrical neodymium N52 magnets and capture of 1500 iron oxide nanoparticles infused in a simulated 14 mm-diameter vessel. Device parameters varied included: magnetization orientation (across the diameter, "D", along the length, "L", of the filter), magnet outer diameter (3, 4, 5 mm), magnet length (5, 10 mm), and spacing between magnets (1, 3 mm). Top designs were tested in vitro using ⁸⁹Zr-radiolabeled iron oxide nanoparticles and gamma counting both in continuous and multiple pass flow model. Computationally, "D" magnetized devices had greater capture than "L" magnetized devices. Increasing outer diameter of magnets increased particle capture as follows: "D" designs, 3 mm: 12.8-13.6 %, 4 mm: 16.6-17.6 %, 5 mm: 21.8-24.6 %; "L" designs, 3 mm: 5.6-10 %, 4 mm: 9.4-15.8 %, 5 mm: 14.8-21.2 %. In vitro, while there was significant capture by all device designs, with most capturing 87-93 % within the first two minutes, compared to control non-magnetic devices, there was no significant difference in particle capture with the parameters varied. The computational study predicts that endovascular magnetic filters demonstrate maximum particle capture with "D" magnetization. In vitro flow testing demonstrated no difference in capture with varied parameters. Clinically, "D" magnetized devices would be most practical, sized as large as possible without causing intravascular flow obstruction.