Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Articulating lay theories through graphical models: A study of beliefs surrounding vaccination decisions

Abstract

How can we leverage the cognitive science of lay theories toinform interventions aimed at correcting misconceptions andchanging behaviors? Focusing on the problem of vaccine skep-ticism, we identified a set of 14 beliefs we hypothesized wouldbe relevant to vaccination decisions. We developed reliablescales to measure these beliefs across a large sample of partici-pants (n = 1130) and employed state-of-the-art graphical struc-ture learning algorithms to uncover the relationships amongthese beliefs. This resulted in a graphical model describingthe system of beliefs relevant to childhood vaccinations, withbeliefs represented as nodes and their interconnections as di-rected edges. This model sheds light on how these beliefs re-late to one another and can be used to predict how interventionsaimed at specific beliefs will play out across the larger system.Moving forward, we hope this modeling approach will helpguide the development of effective, theory-based interventionspromoting childhood vaccination.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View