Evaluating how child allowances and daycare subsidies affect fertility
- Author(s): Goldstein, JR
- Koulovatianos, C
- Li, J
- Schröder, C
- et al.
Published Web Locationhttps://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=889127119117083079065107075124097104036009058007026037005123125009020090073088029087018123040104049123008015096026011095086111001008088038013091107073024085119023006005066077104090105089111003006011025122004001027122127025001073121103006073000114022074&EXT=pdf
We compare the cost effectiveness of two pronatalist policies: (a) child allowances; and (b) daycare subsidies. We pay special attention to estimating how intended fertility (fertility before children are born) responds to these policies. We use two evaluation tools: (i) a dynamic model on fertility, labor supply, outsourced childcare time, parental time, asset accumulation and consumption; and (ii) randomized vignette-survey policy experiments. We implement both tools in the United States and Germany, finding consistent evidence that daycare subsidies are more cost effective. Nevertheless, the required public expenditure to increase fertility to the replacement level might be viewed as prohibitively high.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.