Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

A Disadvantage of Comparison and Contrast in Object Label Learning

Abstract

Multiple studies demonstrate benefits of comparison and contrast for learning relational, taxonomic, and abstract cate-gories. This study examined the effects of comparison and contrast with learning non-relational perceptual information,specifically on 3-year-old childrens learning of labels for novel shape categories. There were four between-subject condi-tions: comparison, contrast (informative), contrast (neutral), and one-example. Each condition heard the novel word threetimes, the difference was in the number of objects (one-example vs. the rest) and the object presentations (comparative vs.contrastive). The test asked children to extend the label to a new example of the category. The results counter-intuitivelyshow that learning from one example outperforms learning from multiple examples via comparison or contrast, suggestinga detrimental role of comparison and contrast for shape categories for children at this level of vocabulary knowledge.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View