Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCLA

UCLA Previously Published Works bannerUCLA

Community Assessment of the Predictability of Cancer Protein and Phosphoprotein Levels from Genomics and Transcriptomics.

  • Author(s): Yang, Mi
  • Petralia, Francesca
  • Li, Zhi
  • Li, Hongyang
  • Ma, Weiping
  • Song, Xiaoyu
  • Kim, Sunkyu
  • Lee, Heewon
  • Yu, Han
  • Lee, Bora
  • Bae, Seohui
  • Heo, Eunji
  • Kaczmarczyk, Jan
  • Stępniak, Piotr
  • Warchoł, Michał
  • Yu, Thomas
  • Calinawan, Anna P
  • Boutros, Paul C
  • Payne, Samuel H
  • Reva, Boris
  • NCI-CPTAC-DREAM Consortium
  • Boja, Emily
  • Rodriguez, Henry
  • Stolovitzky, Gustavo
  • Guan, Yuanfang
  • Kang, Jaewoo
  • Wang, Pei
  • Fenyö, David
  • Saez-Rodriguez, Julio
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405-4712(20)30242-8
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Cancer is driven by genomic alterations, but the processes causing this disease are largely performed by proteins. However, proteins are harder and more expensive to measure than genes and transcripts. To catalyze developments of methods to infer protein levels from other omics measurements, we leveraged crowdsourcing via the NCI-CPTAC DREAM proteogenomic challenge. We asked for methods to predict protein and phosphorylation levels from genomic and transcriptomic data in cancer patients. The best performance was achieved by an ensemble of models, including as predictors transcript level of the corresponding genes, interaction between genes, conservation across tumor types, and phosphosite proximity for phosphorylation prediction. Proteins from metabolic pathways and complexes were the best and worst predicted, respectively. The performance of even the best-performing model was modest, suggesting that many proteins are strongly regulated through translational control and degradation. Our results set a reference for the limitations of computational inference in proteogenomics. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the Supplemental Information.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item