UC Santa Cruz

A central issue in the study of speech production is whether phonological encoding occurs sequentially or in parallel. Some of the strongest evidence for sequential phonological encoding comes from the number of segments primed effect-response latencies decrease when increasing the number of primed segments from 0 to 1 to 2 (e.g., Meyer, 1991). Although it is often assumed that all participants adopt the same response criterion in the naming task, standard instructions can lead to the strategic adoption of different response criteria (such as an initial segment-based criterion or a syllable-based criterion). Furthermore, the number of segments primed effect might be driven by the manner of the initial segment such as the acoustic characteristics of plosives. In this study, participants named monosyllabic words varying in initial segment plosivity in a 0, 1, or 2 segments primed naming task and were instructed in ways to induce either a segment or syllable criterion. Data were analyzed by acoustic latency, articulatory latency, and initial segment duration, as distinguishing between a segment and syllable criterion and sequential and parallel encoding requires more than just a single point in the time-course of articulation. Shorter acoustic latencies when priming 2 segments over 1 were contingent on the manner of the initial segment and the adoption of a segment criterion, clarifying the nature of the number of segments primed effect. Moreover, the similar acoustic latencies found across priming conditions when a syllable criterion was adopted support parallel phonological encoding. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).