UC Davis

The original version of the article unfortunately contained a mistake in the Results and Discussion section. The corrected sentences are given below: 1. In the Results section (paragraph 2): “The psychometric values were moderate, with strongest indices at 24 months: SE = 78% (95% CI 64–91%), SP = 83% (95% CI 78–89%), PPV = 52% (95% CI 40–65%), and NPV = 94% (95% CI 90–98%)." Instead should say, “SE = 77% (95% CI 64–90%), SP = 85% (95% CI 80-91%), PPV = 55% (95% CI 42–68%), and NPV = 94% (95% CI 90–98%)”. 2. In the Discussion section (paragraph 2), “Longitudinally, SE ranged from 52 to 63% and SP from 42 to 83% in our study.” Instead should say, “Longitudinally, SE ranged from 51 to 62% and SP from 42 to 85% in our study”.