The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods.
- Author(s): Menke, Joe;
- Roelandse, Martijn;
- Ozyurt, Burak;
- Martone, Maryann;
- Bandrowski, Anita
- et al.
Published Web Locationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101698
The reproducibility crisis is a multifaceted problem involving ingrained practices within the scientific community. Fortunately, some causes are addressed by the author's adherence to rigor and reproducibility criteria, implemented via checklists at various journals. We developed an automated tool (SciScore) that evaluates research articles based on their adherence to key rigor criteria, including NIH criteria and RRIDs, at an unprecedented scale. We show that despite steady improvements, less than half of the scoring criteria, such as blinding or power analysis, are routinely addressed by authors; digging deeper, we examined the influence of specific checklists on average scores. The average score for a journal in a given year was named the Rigor and Transparency Index (RTI), a new journal quality metric. We compared the RTI with the Journal Impact Factor and found there was no correlation. The RTI can potentially serve as a proxy for methodological quality.