Internet-based Advertising Claims and Consumer Reasons for Using Electronic Cigarettes by Device Type in the US
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Internet-based Advertising Claims and Consumer Reasons for Using Electronic Cigarettes by Device Type in the US

  • Author(s): Pulvers, K
  • Sun, JY
  • Zhuang, Y-L
  • Holguin, G
  • Zhu, S-H
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665577/
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Objectives Important differences exist between closed-system and open-system e-cigarettes, but it is unknown whether online companies are marketing these devices differently and whether consumer reasons for using e-cigarettes vary by device type. This paper compares Internet-based advertising claims of closed- versus open-system products, and evaluates US consumers’ reasons for using closed- versus open-system e-cigarettes. Methods Internet sites selling exclusively closed (N = 130) or open (N = 129) e-cigarettes in December 2013–January 2014 were coded for advertising claims. Current users (≥18 years old) of exclusively closed or open e-cigarettes (N = 860) in a nationally representative online survey in February–March 2014 provided their main reason for using e-cigarettes. Results Internet sites that exclusively sold closed-system e-cigarettes were more likely to make cigarette-related claims such as e-cigarettes being healthier and cheaper than cigarettes (ps < .0001) compared to sites selling open systems. Many sites implied their products could help smokers quit. Exclusive users of both systems endorsed cessation as their top reason. Closed-system users were more likely to report their reason as “use where smoking is banned.” Conclusions Although promotion of e-cigarettes as cessation aids is prohibited, consumers of both systems endorsed smoking cessation as their top reason for using e-cigarettes.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item