- Main
The Accuracy of Interqual Criteria in Determining the Observation versus Inpatient Status in Older Adults with Syncope
- Chang, Anna Marie;
- Hollander, Judd E;
- Su, Erica;
- Weiss, Robert E;
- Yagapen, Annick N;
- Malveau, Susan E;
- Adler, David H;
- Bastani, Aveh;
- Baugh, Christopher W;
- Caterino, Jeffrey M;
- Clark, Carol L;
- Diercks, Deborah B;
- Nicks, Bret A;
- Nishijima, Daniel K;
- Shah, Manish N;
- Stiffler, Kirk A;
- Storrow, Alan B;
- Wilber, Scott T;
- Sun, Benjamin C
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.02.020Abstract
BACKGROUND: McKesson's InterQual criteria are widely used in hospitals to determine if patients should be classified as observation or inpatient status, but the accuracy of the criteria is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether InterQual criteria accurately predicted length of stay (LOS) in older patients with syncope. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a cohort study of adults ≥60 years of age who had syncope. We calculated InterQual criteria and classified the patient as observation or inpatient status. Outcomes were whether LOS were less than or greater than 2 midnights. RESULTS: We analyzed 2361 patients; 1227 (52.0%) patients were male and 1945 (82.8%) were white, with a mean age of 73.2 ± 9.0 years. The median LOS was 32.6 h (interquartile range 24.2-71.8). The sensitivity of InterQual criteria for LOS was 60.8% (95% confidence interval 57.9-63.6%) and the specificity was 47.8% (95% confidence interval 45.0-50.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with syncope, those who met InterQual criteria for inpatient status had longer LOS compared with those who did not; however, the accuracy of the criteria to predict length of stay over 2 days is poor, with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 48%. Future research should identify criteria to improve LOS prediction.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.