Why Stickiness is not Enough to Explain Persistence of Counterintuitive Religious Concepts
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Why Stickiness is not Enough to Explain Persistence of Counterintuitive Religious Concepts

Abstract

Cognitive scientists of religion argue that religious ideas are widespread because they are minimally counterintuitive. Traditional lab studies have found support for a better memory for minimally counterintuitive concepts. This paper presents an in-depth case study of the spread of a counterintuitive religious idea in the real world. It finds that counterintuitiveness alone is not sufficient to guarantee persistence of a religious belief. Novel religious beliefs have to be painstakingly woven into the cultural fabric of a group’s shared social identity to ensure its survival.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View