Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCLA

UCLA Previously Published Works bannerUCLA

Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: A reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer.

  • Author(s): Cefalu, Matthew S;
  • Elliott, Marc N;
  • Setodji, Claude M;
  • Cleary, Paul D;
  • Hays, Ron D
  • et al.
Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the dimensionality of hospital quality indicators treated as unidimensional in a prior publication.

Data source/study design

Pooled cross-sectional 2010-2011 Hospital Compare data (10/1/10 and 10/1/11 archives) and the 2012 American Hospital Association Annual Survey.

Data extraction

We used 71 indicators of structure, process, and outcomes of hospital care in a principal component analysis of Ridit scores to evaluate the dimensionality of the indicators. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis using only the indicators in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Hospital Value-Based Purchasing.

Principal findings

There were four underlying dimensions of hospital quality: patient experience, mortality, and two clinical process dimensions.

Conclusions

Hospital quality should be measured using a variety of indicators reflecting different dimensions of quality. Treating hospital quality as unidimensional leads to erroneous conclusions about the performance of different hospitals.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View