UC Berkeley

Background

Self-reported residential use of pesticides has consistently been associated with increased risk of childhood leukemia. However, these studies were limited in their ability to identify specific insecticide active ingredients that were associated with risk.

Objective

We used household carpet dust measurements of 20 insecticides (two carbamate, 10 organophosphate, two organochlorine, and six pyrethroid) as indicators of exposure and evaluated associations with the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Methods

We conducted a population-based case-control study of 252 ALL cases diagnosed from 1999 to 2007 and 306 birth certificate controls from 35 counties in Central and Northern California. Carpet dust was collected at a second interview (2001-2007) for cases who had not moved since diagnosis (comparable reference date for controls) using a specialized vacuum cleaner in the room where the child spent most of their time or from the household vacuum. Insecticides were categorized as detected (yes/no), or as tertiles or quartiles of their distributions among controls. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression adjusting for demographic characteristics, interview year, and season of dust collection.

Results

Permethrin, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and carbaryl were the most frequently detected insecticide active ingredients. When we compared the highest quartile to the lowest or to non-detections, there was no association with ALL for permethrin (OR Q4 vs. Q1 = 0.81; 95% CI 0.50-1.31), carbaryl (OR Q4 vs. non-detects = 0.61, 95% CI 0.34-1.08) or chlorpyrifos (OR Q4 vs. Q1 = 0.60; 95% CI 0.36-1.00). The highest quartile of diazinon concentration was inversely associated with risk in the single pesticide model but without a monotonic exposure-response (p-trend = 0.14). After adjusting for other common insecticides, the OR was not significant (OR Q4 vs. Q1 = 0.58; 95% CI 0.33-1.05). None of the other insecticides were associated with risk.

Conclusion

Our results should be interpreted within the limitations of the case-control study design including the use of a single post-diagnosis dust sample and restriction to residentially stable participants, which may have resulted in selection bias. Although difficult to implement, additional studies with assessment of exposure to insecticide active and non-active ingredients are necessary to elucidate the role of these common exposures in childhood leukemia risk.