The Elusive 'Four Corners' of Capitan Grande
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC Irvine

UC Irvine Previously Published Works bannerUC Irvine

The Elusive 'Four Corners' of Capitan Grande

Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
Abstract

Conflicts over reservation boundaries have a long and torrid history in the Mission Indian Agency of Southern California. Because the 1852 treaties of Santa Ysabel and Temecula were repudiated by the Senate, the federal government's oversight of Indian affairs in Southern California was weak. "Even when the government did attempt to aid the Indians, the efforts were ultimately undermined by political forces on the local, state, and national level," writes Glenn Farris (Hartnell 2004:14). Until the 1930s, only sporadic attempts to stabilize or defend executive order reservation boundaries were made. Rather, the political will was focused on the speedy dissolution of the reservations and the termination of federal responsibility. A detailed case study of the labyrinthine bureaucratic muddle over Capitan Grande reservation's boundaries is presented here as a microcosm of what was occurring on most of the Mission Indian Agency reservations in Southern California. This essay and its accompanying maps will document the numerous boundary changes from 1875 to 1934.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View