Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Does your model weigh the same as a duck?

  • Author(s): Jain, AN
  • Cleves, AE
  • et al.

Published Web Location

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276372/
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Computer-aided drug design is a mature field by some measures, and it has produced notable successes that underpin the study of interactions between small molecules and living systems. However, unlike a truly mature field, fallacies of logic lie at the heart of the arguments in support of major lines of research on methodology and validation thereof. Two particularly pernicious ones are cum hoc ergo propter hoc (with this, therefore because of this) and confirmation bias (seeking evidence that is confirmatory of the hypothesis at hand). These fallacies will be discussed in the context of off-target predictive modeling, QSAR, molecular similarity computations, and docking. Examples will be shown that avoid these problems. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item