Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society

In this paper, we compare the rhetoric that sometimes appears in the literature on computational models of category learning with the growing evidence that different theoretical paradigms typically produce similar results. In response, we suggest that concrete computational models, which currently dominate the field, may be less useful than simulations that operate at a more abstrcict level. We illustrate this point with an abstract simulation that explains a challenging phenomenon in the area of category learning - the effect of consistent contrasts - and we conclude with some general observations about such abstract models.