Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

The CATESOL Journal

The CATESOL Journal bannerUC Berkeley

Error Treatment Preferences of Adult Intensive English Program Students: Does Proficiency Matter?

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.5070/B5.36269Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
Abstract

This survey-based study examined the preferences of adult English as a second language (ESL) learners regarding two types of corrective feedback in an Intensive English Program (IEP) setting. The first type of corrective feedback was implicit and included recasts and clarification requests, whereas the second type was more explicit and was represented by overt error correction and metalinguistic explanation. Additionally, a possible connection between the proficiency level of the students and their self-reported preferences was explored. The total number of participants was 87, representing 11 first-language backgrounds. The findings revealed that the ESL students in this IEP context generally preferred explicit feedback, but they did favor one particular type of implicit feedback—recasts. Furthermore, the more proficient students preferred feedback that focused on accuracy rather than fluency. The study has implications for the adult ESL grammar classroom in an IEP context, encouraging instructors to identify and consider students’ self-perceived needs with respect to error correction.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View