Family history of dementia and APOE e4 status predict neurocognitive trajectories among persons with HIV
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC San Diego

UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations bannerUC San Diego

Family history of dementia and APOE e4 status predict neurocognitive trajectories among persons with HIV

Abstract

Rationale: HIV and aging are associated with an increased risk for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Cross-sectional research among people with HIV (PWH) has shown that the apolipoprotein e4 (APOE-e4) allele and family history of dementia (FHD+) are independently associated with worse neurocognition. However, these cross-sectional data do not address the potential additive effect of FHD and APOE-e4 on rates of global and domain-specific neurocognitive decline among older PWH.Design: This study utilized longitudinal data from the CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research programs (N=283 PWH; ages 45-69). Aim 1 used a 2x2 factorial analysis of covariance to model independent and interactive effects of FHD and APOE-e4 status. Aim 2 used linear mixed-effects modeling to examine global- and domain-specific neurocognitive trajectories (average follow-up = 7.0 visits over 5.4 years) in the four FHD/APOE-e4 groups linearly and non-linearly. The exploratory aim examined if demographic, neuropsychiatric, substance use, daily functioning factors, comorbidities, and HIV disease characteristics impact neurocognitive trajectories by FHD and APOE-e4 status, using linear mixed-effects modeling. Results: Cross-sectional analyses revealed lower executive functioning (p = .03) and motor skills (p = .04) T-scores among FHD+. Global T-scores trended towards significance (p = .07), with lower scores among FHD+. Mean differences in motor skills trended towards significance by APOE-e4 status (p = .08), with worse scores among APOE-e4 carriers. Longitudinal analyses revealed significant and trend-level differences in curvilinear trajectories between the FHD-/APOE-e4- and FHD+/APOE-e4+ groups in global performance (p = .01), executive functioning (p = .08), learning (p = .02), delayed recall (p = .07), and motor skills (p = .004). Lastly, demographics, depression, substance use history, cardiovascular conditions, and HIV-disease characteristics significantly predicted poorer neurocognitive outcomes, with worse global- and domain-specific trajectories in the FHD+/APOE-e4+ compared to the FHD-/APOE-e4- group. Conclusions: FHD+ and APOE-e4 jointly heighten risk of cognitive decline among middle-to-older age PWH with compounding medical and psychiatric burdens. Additional research is needed to clarify whether domain-specific differences in curvilinear cognitive trajectories between FHD+/APOE-e4+ and FHD-/APOE-e4- reflect HAND or early-stages of AD, considering there were limited sample sizes in follow-up visits and the possibility that cohorts may have been too young to detect expected neurocognitive decline.  

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View