UC Davis

Purpose

Non-human primates (NHPs) are useful models for human retinal disease. Chromatic pupillometry has been proposed as a noninvasive method of identifying inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) in humans; however, standard protocols employ time-consuming dark adaptation. We utilized shortened and standard dark-adaptation protocols to compare pupillary light reflex characteristics following chromatic stimulation in rhesus macaques with achromatopsia to wild-type (WT) controls with normal retinal function.

Methods

Nine rhesus macaques homozygous for the p.R656Q mutation (PDE6C HOMs) and nine WT controls were evaluated using chromatic pupillometry following 1-minute versus standard 20-minute dark adaptations. The following outcomes were measured and compared between groups: pupil constriction latency, peak constriction, pupil constriction time, and constriction velocity.

Results

Pupil constriction latency was significantly longer in PDE6C HOMs with red-light (P = 0.0002) and blue-light (P = 0.04) stimulation versus WT controls. Peak constriction was significantly less in PDE6C HOMs with all light stimulation compared to WT controls (P < 0.0001). Pupil constriction time was significantly shorter in PDE6C HOMs versus WT controls with red-light (P = 0.04) and white-light (P = 0.003) stimulation. Pupil constriction velocity was significantly slower in PDE6C HOMs versus WT controls with red-light (P < 0.0001), blue-light (P < 0.0001), and white-light (P = 0.0002) stimulation. Dark adaptation time only significantly affected peak (P = 0.008) and time of pupil constriction (P = 0.02) following blue-light stimulation.

Conclusions

Chromatic pupillometry following 1- and 20-minute dark adaptation is an effective tool for screening NHPs for achromatopsia.

Translational relevance

Rapid identification of NHPs with IRDs will provide animal research models to advance research and treatment of achromatopia in humans.