- Main
Development and validation of the Uniform Data Set (v3.0) executive function composite score (UDS3‐EF)
- Staffaroni, Adam M;
- Asken, Breton M;
- Casaletto, Kaitlin B;
- Fonseca, Corrina;
- You, Michelle;
- Rosen, Howard J;
- Boxer, Adam L;
- Elahi, Fanny M;
- Kornak, John;
- Mungas, Dan;
- Kramer, Joel H
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12214Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cognitive composite scores offer a means of precisely measuring executive functioning (EF). METHODS: We developed the Uniform Data Set v3.0 EF composite score (UDS3-EF) in 3507 controls from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center dataset using item-response theory and applied nonlinear and linear demographic adjustments. The UDS3-EF was validated with other neuropsychological tests and brain magnetic resonance imaging from independent research cohorts using linear models. RESULTS: Final model fit was good-to-excellent: comparative fit index = 0.99; root mean squared error of approximation = 0.057. UDS3-EF scores differed across validation cohorts (controls > mild cognitive impairment > Alzheimer's disease-dementia ≈ behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; P < 0.001). The UDS3-EF correlated most strongly with other EF tests (βs = 0.50 to 0.85, Ps < 0.001) and more with frontal, parietal, and temporal lobe gray matter volumes (βs = 0.18 to 0.33, Ps ≤ 0.004) than occipital gray matter (β = 0.12, P = 0.04). The total sample needed to detect a 40% reduction in UDS3-EF change (n = 286) was ≈40% of the next best measure (F-words; n = 714). CONCLUSIONS: The UDS3-EF is well suited to quantify EF in research and clinical trials and offers psychometric and practical advantages over its component tests.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.