Is It Better to Be in Shape or on Top of It? The Impact of Control, Valence, and Expectedness on Non-Spatial Uses of in and on
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Is It Better to Be in Shape or on Top of It? The Impact of Control, Valence, and Expectedness on Non-Spatial Uses of in and on

Abstract

Using the prepositions in and on, Jamrozik and Gentner (2015; 2014; 2011) explored a particular factor of meaning that was hypothesized to serve as a metaphorical link between spatial and abstract concepts. Across several studies, these researchers have provided evidence for the idea that there is a “continuum of control” that exists for both spatial and abstract uses of in and on. Our research explores other potential meaning factors that might play a role in non-spatial uses of in and on. Our results replicate and extend Jamrozik and Gentner’s (2011) findings. We advocate using a multi-componential approach as research involving indirect metaphors continues moving forward.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View