Skip to main content
Does Surgeon-Performed Intraoperative Wire Localization Allow for Lower Margin Positivity Rates Compared to Radiologist-Performed Preoperative Localization in Early Breast Cancer?
Abstract
Background
This study compares positive margin rates in breast conserving surgery (BCS) for early breast cancer using two localization techniques: surgeon-performed intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization (IOWL) versus radiologist-performed preoperative wire localization (POWL).Methods
Patients with unifocal breast cancer undergoing BCS with follow-up at a single institution were retrospectively identified. Factors associated with positive margins were identified.Results
177 patients underwent IOWL (N = 85) or POWL (N = 92). There was a significantly lower rate of positive margins for IOWL vs. POWL (7.1 % vs. 23.9 %, p = 0.002) and a corresponding lower rate of re-excision for IOWL vs. POWL (5.9 % vs. 18.5 %, p = 0.011). Presence of DCIS was associated with positive margins (p = 0.015). After adjusting for presence of DCIS, tumor size, and volume of tissue removed, the positive margin rate was significantly lower in the IOWL group compared to the POWL group (aOR 0.34, 95 % CI 0.13-0.93).Conclusions
In this study, adjusted analysis favored IOWL in achieving negative tumor margins. Prospective studies are needed to further explore the impact of IOWL on quality, cost-effectiveness, and patient experience.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.