Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Categorical vs Coordinate Relationships do not reduce to spatial frequencydifferences

Abstract

Categorical and coordinate stimulus processing were hypoth-esized by Kosslyn (1987) to be lateralized visual tasks, dif-ferentiated by task-relevant spatial frequencies. Slotnick et al.(2001) directly tested Kosslyn’s hypothesis and concluded thatthe lateralization presents only when tasks are sufficiently dif-ficult. Our differential encoding model is a three layer neuralnetwork that accounts for lateralization in visual processingvia the biologically plausible mechanism of differences in con-nection spread of long-range lateral neural connections (Hsiao,Cipollini, & Cottrell, 2013). We show that our model accountsfor Slotnick’s data and that Slotnick’s analysis does not con-vincingly explain their results. Instead, we propose that Koss-lyn’s initial hypothesis was based on an incorrect assumption:categorical and coordinate stimuli are not solely differentiatedby spatial frequencies. The results that our model capturescannot be reproduced by Ivry and Robertson’s (1998) Dou-ble Filtering by Frequency theory, which is driven solely bylateralized spatial frequency processing.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View