Skip to main content
Final results of a phase 3 study of trebananib plus weekly paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer (TRINOVA-1): Long-term survival, impact of ascites, and progression-free survival-2
- Monk, Bradley J;
- Poveda, Andrés;
- Vergote, Ignace;
- Raspagliesi, Francesco;
- Fujiwara, Keiichi;
- Bae, Duk-Soo;
- Oaknin, Ana;
- Ray-Coquard, Isabelle;
- Provencher, Diane M;
- Karlan, Beth Y;
- Lhommé, Catherine;
- Richardson, Gary;
- Rincón, Dolores Gallardo;
- Coleman, Robert L;
- Marth, Christian;
- Brize, Arija;
- Fabbro, Michel;
- Redondo, Andrés;
- Bamias, Aristotelis;
- Ma, Haijun;
- Vogl, Florian D;
- Bach, Bruce A;
- Oza, Amit M
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0090825816309830/1-s2.0-S0090825816309830-main.pdf?_tid=5326fcf2-a3e1-11e7-8951-00000aacb35e&acdnat=1506557561_43e543fe3a96c5d537df554efe9baa04No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract
Purpose
Trebananib, a peptibody that blocks binding of angiopoietin-1 and -2 to Tie2, significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer in the phase 3 TRINOVA-1 study. We report overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat population and clinically relevant subgroups and time to second disease progression (PFS-2).Patients and methods
Women with recurrent disease (platinum-free interval<12months) were randomized to receive intravenous paclitaxel 80mg/m(2) (3weeks on/1week off) plus intravenous trebananib 15mg/kg or placebo, weekly. OS in the intent-to-treat population was a key secondary endpoint. Exploratory analysis of PFS-2 was conducted according to guidance by the European Medicines Agency.Results
Median OS was not significantly improved with trebananib compared with placebo (19.3 versus 18.3months; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.81-1.11; P=0.52) in the intent-to-treat population (n=919). In subgroup analysis, trebananib improved median OS compared with placebo (14.5 versus 12.3months; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93; P=0.011) in patients with ascites at baseline (n=295). In the intent-to-treat population, trebananib significantly improved median PFS-2 compared with placebo (12.5 versus 10.9months; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98; P=0.024). The incidence and type of adverse events in this updated analysis was consistent with that described in the primary analysis; no new safety signals were detected.Conclusions
OS was not significantly longer in the intent-to-treat population, although there was an improvement in OS in patients with ascites receiving trebananib. PFS-2 confirmed that the PFS benefit associated with trebananib was maintained through the second disease progression independent of the choice of subsequent therapy.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.