Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Randomized Trial of a “Dynamic Choice” Patient-Centered Care Intervention for Mobile Persons With HIV in East Africa
- Ayieko, James;
- Balzer, Laura B;
- Inviolata, Colette;
- Kakande, Elijah;
- Opel, Fred;
- Wafula, Erick M;
- Kabami, Jane;
- Owaraganise, Asiphas;
- Mwangwa, Florence;
- Nakato, Hellen;
- Bukusi, Elizabeth A;
- Camlin, Carol S;
- Charlebois, Edwin D;
- Bacon, Melanie C;
- Petersen, Maya L;
- Kamya, Moses R;
- Havlir, Diane V;
- Chamie, Gabriel;
- Team, SEARCH Study
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000003311Abstract
Background
Persons with HIV (PWH) with high mobility face obstacles to HIV care engagement and viral suppression. We sought to understand whether a patient-centered intervention for mobile PWH would improve viral suppression and retention in care, and if so, which subgroups would benefit most.Methods
In a randomized trial, we evaluated the effect of an intervention designed to address barriers to care among mobile (≥2 weeks out of community in previous year) PWH with viral nonsuppression or recent missed visits in Kenya and Uganda (NCT04810650). The intervention included dynamic choice of a "travel pack" (emergency antiretroviral therapy [ART] supply, discrete ART packaging, and travel checklist), multimonth and offsite refills, facilitated transfer to out-of-community clinics, and hotline access to a mobility coordinator. The primary outcome was viral suppression (<400 copies/mL) at 48 weeks. Secondary outcomes included retention in care and ART possession.Results
From April 2021 to July 2022, 201 participants were enrolled and randomized (102 intervention, 99 control): 109 (54%) were female participants and 101 (50%) from Kenya; median age was 37 years (interquartile range: 29-43). At 48 weeks, there was no significant difference in viral suppression in intervention (85%) vs. control (86%). The intervention improved retention in care (risk ratio: 1.06[1.02-1.1]; P < 0.001) and ART possession (risk ratio: 1.07[1.03-1.11]; P < 0.001), with larger effect sizes among persons with baseline nonsuppression and high mobility (≥2 weeks out of community in previous 3 months).Conclusions
Mobile PWH-centered care should be considered for high-risk mobile populations, including nonsuppressed and highly mobile PWH, to improve retention in care and sustain viral suppression over time.Trial registration
NCT04810650.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%